[2012] KEHC 5065 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 5065 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had provided a satisfactory explanation for the seven-month delay in filing the appeal, namely his ill-health, which was supported by affidavit evidence. The court considered that the dispute involved land and succession, matters of significant importance, and that it was just to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] KEHC 5065 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Paul Mburu Muiruri; Respondent: Esther Wangui Muiruri; Respondent: Lawrence Gakuya Muiruri; Respondent: Mary Mugure Muiruri; Respondent: Wanjiru Muiruri
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 865 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
DW Mbuteti
Legal Topics
Extension of Time to Appeal, Succession Disputes, Distribution of Estate, Testamentary Wishes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Extension of Time to Appeal Succession Disputes Distribution of Estate Testamentary Wishes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Paul Mburu Muiruri

Applicant

Esther Wangui Muiruri

Respondent

Lawrence Gakuya Muiruri

Respondent

Mary Mugure Muiruri

Respondent

Wanjiru Muiruri

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time against the lower court's decree in a succession cause.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing the appeal was sufficiently explained and justified.
  3. 3 Whether the interests of justice require that the applicant be allowed to exhaust his right of appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had provided a satisfactory explanation for the seven-month delay in filing the appeal, namely his ill-health, which was supported by affidavit evidence. The court considered that the dispute involved land and succession, matters of significant importance, and that it was just to allow the applicant to exhaust his right of appeal. The court was satisfied that the interests of justice would be served by granting leave to appeal out of time, and accordingly allowed the application, granting the applicant ten days from the date of the ruling to file the memorandum of appeal. The respondents were awarded the costs of the application.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The applicant is granted leave to appeal out of time.
  • The memorandum of appeal may be filed within ten (10) days of delivery of this ruling.