[2014] KEELRC 333 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant was genuinely declared redundant due to the respondent's inability to pay his salary. The redundancy was not challenged as being in bad faith, and the claimant had already received terminal benefits, including one month's salary in lieu of notice. The court held that the claimant...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEELRC 333 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Paul Musili Mutambuki; Respondent: Hardwick Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 1223 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- claim partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy, Severance Pay, Unlawful Termination, Terminal Benefits
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Musili Mutambuki
Claimant
Hardwick Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was lawfully declared redundant by the respondent.
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to severance pay and other terminal benefits.
- 3 Whether the termination amounted to unlawful dismissal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant was genuinely declared redundant due to the respondent's inability to pay his salary. The redundancy was not challenged as being in bad faith, and the claimant had already received terminal benefits, including one month's salary in lieu of notice. The court held that the claimant was entitled to severance pay equivalent to one month's salary, as per the Employment Act, 2007, and that this amount sufficed to mitigate any loss suffered. The claim for additional compensation for unlawful termination was not upheld, as the redundancy process was found to be genuine and in compliance with statutory requirements.
Court Disposition
claim partly allowed
Orders
- The respondent shall pay the claimant severance pay in the sum of Kshs.58,384.62.
- The award is payable with interest at court rates from the date of judgment to payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 1223 OF 2010
PAUL MUSILI MUTAMBUKI …………………..…….. CLAIMANT
VERSUS
HARDWICK LIMITED …………………..…..…… RESPONDENT
Mrs Gakoi for the Claimant
Mr. Onyoni Opini for the Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The Claimant alleges to have been declared redundant by the Respondent on 22 March 2010 and ordered to vacate the Respondent’s premises.
2. It is his claim that he was employed by the Respondent in August 2008 in the capacity of Human Resource Manager earning a monthly salary of Kshs.58,384. 62 as shown in his pay-slip marked Annex B1 to the statement of claim. The Claimant, claims Kshs.765,227. 75.
3. The Respondent admits that it employed the Claimant on 6th August 2008 and was given a letter of appointment signed by the Claimant on 22nd August 2008.
4. It is also not in dispute that the termination of the Claimant was on 23rd March 2010 vide a letter of termination of the same date.
The Claimant was paid terminal dues as per Appendix B2 to the Statement of Claim and now claims;
service gratuity calculated as follows: (58,384. 62 x 1. 66 x 2/3) in the sum of Kshs.64,612. 31; and
twelve months salary being compensation for unlawful termination.
5. The letter of termination dated 22nd March 2010 gives no reason for the termination of the Claimant’s service. The Claimant states in his pleadings and in his evidence before Court that he was wrongfully declared redundant.
The Respondent did not testify in this matter but only relied on the pleadings and written submissions.
6. By a letter dated 24th June 2010 written to the Advocate for the Claimant, Mr. Peter K. Kibogo the Group Human Resource Manager offered to pay the Claimant severance pay equivalent to one month’s salary since the Claimant had served for seventeen months only.
7. In terms of Section 40(1)(g), of the Employment Act, 2007 the employer ought to have paid severance pay at the rate of not less than fifteen days pay for each completed year of service. Accordingly the Claimant is entitled to a month’s salary severance pay and the Court awards the Claimant Kshs.58,384. 62 accordingly.
8. In terms of the letter of Appeal against termination of the Claimant’s services dated 30th March 2010, the Claimant states that the reason given to him verbally by the Respondent being, inability to pay his salary was in his view genuine but asked for payment of extra terminal benefits other than the one month’s salary in lieu of notice that had been paid.
9. The Court finds that this was a genuine case of declaration of redundancy and the loss suffered by the Claimant is well mitigated by the terminal benefits already paid. The Award of severance pay in the sum of Kshs.58,384. 62 suffices.
The Award is payable with interest at Court rates from the date of this judgment to payment in full.
The Respondent is also to pay the costs of this suit.
Dated and Delivered at Nairobi this 16th day of July, 2014.
MATHEWS N. NDUMA
PRINCIPAL JUDGE