[2024] KEELRC 1431 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had provided professional services to the respondent, resulting in taxed costs across eight matters. No response or challenge to the certificate of taxation or the retainer was filed by the respondent. Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act provides that the certificate of taxation is...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELRC 1431 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Paul Mwangi & Co. Advocates; Respondent: P.V.R Rao Receiver of Athi River Steel Plant Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Cause E218 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Cause / Ruling on Application for Entry of Judgment on Taxed Costs
- Outcome
- Judgment entered for the applicant as prayed.
- Judges
- Nzioki wa Makau
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Certificate of Taxation, Client Advocate Bill of Costs, Entry of Judgment, Retainer Dispute, Costs Award
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Mwangi & Co. Advocates
Applicant
P.V.R Rao Receiver of Athi River Steel Plant Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Cause / Ruling on Application for Entry of Judgment on Taxed Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the sum certified in the certificate of taxation.
- 2 Whether the respondent has contested the certificate of taxation or the retainer.
- 3 Whether the court should enter judgment as prayed for the applicant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had provided professional services to the respondent, resulting in taxed costs across eight matters. No response or challenge to the certificate of taxation or the retainer was filed by the respondent. Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act provides that the certificate of taxation is final unless set aside or altered, and in the absence of any dispute, the court is empowered to enter judgment for the certified sum. The court therefore entered judgment for the applicant for the total taxed amount, with interest from the specified date and awarded costs of the application.
Court Disposition
Judgment entered for the applicant as prayed.
Orders
- Judgment entered for the applicant against the respondent for Kshs. 1,656,890.84 with interest at court rates from 10th August 2023 until payment in full.
- The applicant is awarded costs of the motion assessed at Kshs. 75,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Paul Mwangi & Co. Advocates v P.V.R Rao Receiver of Athi River Steel Plant Limited (Miscellaneous Cause E218 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 1431 (KLR) (11 June 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELRC 1431 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Miscellaneous Cause E218 of 2023
Nzioki wa Makau, J
June 11, 2024
Between
Paul Mwangi & Co. Advocates
Applicant
and
P.V.R Rao Receiver of Athi River Steel Plant Limited
Respondent
Ruling
1. The Applicant vide its notice of motion application dated 24th October 2023 seeks for the following orders:-a.That the judgment entered in favour of the Applicant against the Respondent herein for the sum of Kshs. 1,656,890. 84 together with interest at court rates from 10th August 2023 till payment in full.b.That the cost of this application be paid by the Respondent in any event.
2. The Application was premised on the grounds appearing on the face of the motion and was also supported by the affidavit of Mr. Paul Muriithi Mwangi together with the annexures thereto.
3. The Respondent had not filed a response by the time the matter was placed for directions on the manner of its disposal. Leave was granted to the Respondent to file a response in presence of counsel for the Respondent Mr. Kamara. The Court as at the time of penning the Ruling had neither seen a response nor submissions by the Respondent.
4. The Applicant submitted that the only issue for the Court to determine is whether the application is merited. The Applicant submitted that a certificate of taxation was issued to the Applicant after taxation of Client-Advocate Bills of costs on various matters. It was submitted that the total for the 8 matters was a sum of Kshs. 1,656,890. 84 which ought to be put into effect through the entry of judgment as prayed in the motion. It was submitted that section 51(2) of the Advocates Act makes provision that the certificate of taxation issued by the taxing officer is final as to the amount of costs covered thereby unless set aside or altered by the Court. The Applicant submitted that there is no dispute as to the retainer of the Applicant and that as such, the Court can enter judgment on the sum as prayed for in the notice of motion. The Applicant cited the case of Mbai & Kibuthu v Mbo-I-Kamiti Farmers Company Limited [2006] eKLR where the Court allowed a similar application on the basis that the taxation had not been contested nor a certificate challenged. It was urged that the application should be allowed as prayed.
5. The Advocates Act makes provision under section 51(2) as follows:-(2)The certificate of the taxing officer by whom any bill has been taxed shall, unless it is set aside or altered by the Court, be final as to the amount of the costs covered thereby, and the Court may make such order in relation thereto as it thinks fit, including, in a case where the retainer is not disputed, an order that judgment be entered for the sum certified to be due with costs. [Emphasis supplied]
6. The Applicant gave professional services to the Respondent from all accounts and subsequently, fees were raised and taxation ensued leading to various sums being awarded in Misc. Cause E055 of 2023 – Kshs. 224,132. 32, Misc. Cause No. E060 of 2023 – Kshs. 213,984. 60, Misc. Cause No. E061 of 2023 – 138,713/-, Misc. Cause No. E062 of 2023 – Kshs. 153,860/-, Misc. Cause No. E063 of 2023 – Kshs. 176,234. 50, Misc. Cause No. E064 of 2023 – Kshs. 245,630/-, Misc. Cause No. E065 of 2023 – Kshs. 333,509. 42 and Misc. Cause No. E066 of 2023 – Kshs. 170,737/-. Having not seen any reversal by a Judge of the sums duly taxed, there is nothing to bar the Court from granting the notice of motion as drawn by the Applicant. The sums due on the 8 matters referenced herein should be payable as an order of the Court. I therefore enter judgment for the Applicant against the Respondent for the sum of Kshs. 1,656,890. 84 with interest at court rates from 10th August 2023 till payment in full. The Applicant will also have the costs of the motion before me which I assess at Kshs. 75,000/-.It is so ordered.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 11THDAY OF JUNE 2024NZIOKI WA MAKAUJUDGE