[2012] KEHC 4616 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 4616 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to appear at the hearing of their own application, despite having previously benefited from an ex parte order and having caused two prior adjournments. In the absence of the applicant and upon consideration of the respondent's submissions and supporting affidavit, the court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] KEHC 4616 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Paul Naske Mukora; Defendant: CCMC Motors Group Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 490 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Interlocutory Application Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed with costs to the defendant
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunctions, Ex Parte Orders, Adjournment of Hearing
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Interlocutory Injunctions Ex Parte Orders Adjournment of Hearing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Paul Naske Mukora

Plaintiff

CCMC Motors Group Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Interlocutory Application Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a restraining order preventing repossession of motor vehicle No. KBE 045 V pending determination of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the application should be dismissed due to non-appearance of the applicant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to appear at the hearing of their own application, despite having previously benefited from an ex parte order and having caused two prior adjournments. In the absence of the applicant and upon consideration of the respondent's submissions and supporting affidavit, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the application with costs to the defendant, in accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules regarding non-appearance.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs to the defendant

Orders

  • The plaintiff's application dated 9/11/2011 is dismissed with costs to the defendant.