[2017] KEMC 114 (KLR)

[2017] KEMC 114 (KLR)

The court found that, as a gazetted election court, it has jurisdiction under Rule 19 of the Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petitions Rules 2017 to extend the time for filing and serving responses. The application by the 3rd Respondent was made without inordinate delay, and granting the extension...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEMC 114 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Paul Odhiambo Okello; Respondent: Independent Electoral Commission; Respondent: Roselyne A Onyango; Respondent: Ouma Moses Pius
Court
Magistrate's Court
Court Station
Election Petition in Magistrate Courts
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Election Petition 7 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Election Petitions / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve Response
Outcome
Application for extension of time allowed.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Jurisdiction of Election Court, Service of Pleadings
Source Language
en
Election Petitions Extension of Time Jurisdiction of Election Court Service of Pleadings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Paul Odhiambo Okello

Applicant

Independent Electoral Commission

Respondent

Roselyne A Onyango

Respondent

Ouma Moses Pius

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Election Petitions / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve Response

  1. 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to extend time for filing and serving a response in an election petition.
  2. 2 Whether the application for extension of time was made without inordinate delay and if granting it would prejudice the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, as a gazetted election court, it has jurisdiction under Rule 19 of the Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petitions Rules 2017 to extend the time for filing and serving responses. The application by the 3rd Respondent was made without inordinate delay, and granting the extension would not prejudice the Petitioner. Therefore, the court allowed the application, granting the 3rd Respondent leave to file and serve his response within three days, with costs to be borne by the Applicants.

Court Disposition

Application for extension of time allowed.

Orders

  • The 3rd Respondent is granted leave to file and serve his response within three days.
  • The Applicants shall meet the costs of this suit.