[2014] KEELRC 1320 (KLR)

[2014] KEELRC 1320 (KLR)

The court found that although there was no formal written renewal of the claimant's contract after May 2013, the respondent's conduct and correspondence indicated the claimant was allowed and encouraged to continue working, with assurances that his benefits would not be lost if the contract was renewed. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEELRC 1320 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Paul Oduor Angila; Respondent: Mikutra Water & Sanitation Co. Ltd
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 56 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant.
Judges
HS Wasilwa
Legal Topics
Unlawful Termination, Employment Contracts, Terminal Dues, Gratuity Entitlement, Leave Allowance, Notice Pay
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unlawful Termination Employment Contracts Terminal Dues Gratuity Entitlement Leave Allowance Notice Pay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Paul Oduor Angila

Claimant

Mikutra Water & Sanitation Co. Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether there was a valid third contract between the claimant and respondent.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant's contract was unlawfully terminated.
  3. 3 What terminal dues and benefits the claimant is entitled to.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although there was no formal written renewal of the claimant's contract after May 2013, the respondent's conduct and correspondence indicated the claimant was allowed and encouraged to continue working, with assurances that his benefits would not be lost if the contract was renewed. The piecemeal extensions and continued service amounted to a de facto contract for the period served. The respondent's failure to provide proper notice or pay salary in lieu of notice constituted unlawful termination. The court accepted the respondent's admissions regarding salary arrears, gratuity, and leave allowance, and found the claimant entitled to additional sums for airtime and...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant.

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant salary arrears of Kshs 245,096.
  • Respondent to pay claimant leave allowance under 1st contract of Kshs 75,000.