[2015] KEHC 7714 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 7714 (KLR)

The court held that, pursuant to the prevailing legal position as established by the Court of Appeal in Christine Wangari Gachege vs. Elizabeth Wanjiru Evans & Others (2014) eKLR, it is not necessary to seek leave before commencing contempt of court proceedings. The application for leave was therefore procedurally...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 7714 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Paulina Chemutai; Respondent: Kipyegon Arap Sang; Respondent: Maria Tapsagaa Chirchir; Respondent: Jacqueline Chepkorir; Respondent: Peter K. Langat; Contemnor: Jotham Ngeno
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 57 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Commence Contempt Proceedings
Outcome
application struck out
Judges
MA Silau
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Leave to Institute Proceedings, Procedural Requirements
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Leave to Institute Proceedings Procedural Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Paulina Chemutai

Applicant

Kipyegon Arap Sang

Respondent

Maria Tapsagaa Chirchir

Respondent

Jacqueline Chepkorir

Respondent

Peter K. Langat

Respondent

Jotham Ngeno

Contemnor

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Commence Contempt Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether leave is required to commence contempt of court proceedings under the current law.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that, pursuant to the prevailing legal position as established by the Court of Appeal in Christine Wangari Gachege vs. Elizabeth Wanjiru Evans & Others (2014) eKLR, it is not necessary to seek leave before commencing contempt of court proceedings. The application for leave was therefore procedurally unnecessary and thus misconceived. As a result, the application was struck out for being misplaced, with no orders as to costs.

Court Disposition

application struck out

Orders

  • The application dated 28th September, 2015 is struck out.
  • There shall be no orders as to costs.