[2016] KEELRC 1588 (KLR)

[2016] KEELRC 1588 (KLR)

The court found that the claimants were employed by the respondent for long periods and, by operation of law, ceased to be casual laborers, thus entitled to the protections and benefits of permanent employees. The evidence established that the claimants were consistently paid below the statutory minimum wage as set...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEELRC 1588 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mrs. Paulina Thambi Munyeke; Applicant: Mrs. Celina Kalayu Thame; Applicant: Mrs. Njeri Mbutha Kagame; Applicant: Mrs. Monica Wanja Gatheru; Applicant: Mrs. Hannah Wanjiru Kamau; Applicant: Mrs. Hannah Wanjiru Buria; Applicant: Mrs. Hannah Wanjiku Muiruri; Respondent: M/s Barua Estate Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 96 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
judgment_for_claimants
Judges
HS Wasilwa
Legal Topics
Unlawful Termination, Wage Underpayment, Compensation for Dismissal, Statutory Entitlements, Collective Bargaining Agreements
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unlawful Termination Wage Underpayment Compensation for Dismissal Statutory Entitlements Collective Bargaining Agreements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mrs. Paulina Thambi Munyeke

Applicant

Mrs. Celina Kalayu Thame

Applicant

Mrs. Njeri Mbutha Kagame

Applicant

Mrs. Monica Wanja Gatheru

Applicant

Mrs. Hannah Wanjiru Kamau

Applicant

Mrs. Hannah Wanjiru Buria

Applicant

Mrs. Hannah Wanjiku Muiruri

Applicant

M/s Barua Estate Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimants were unlawfully terminated from employment.
  2. 2 Whether the claimants were underpaid in contravention of statutory wage orders.
  3. 3 Whether the claimants are entitled to compensation for unfair termination and underpayments.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimants were employed by the respondent for long periods and, by operation of law, ceased to be casual laborers, thus entitled to the protections and benefits of permanent employees. The evidence established that the claimants were consistently paid below the statutory minimum wage as set out in the relevant wage orders for the years in question. The respondent failed to appear or contest the claims, and no evidence was provided to show that the claimants were accorded due process or paid their lawful entitlements. The court held that the claimants were unfairly terminated without notice or hearing, in violation of the Employment Act. Accordingly, the court...

Court Disposition

judgment_for_claimants

Orders

  • Judgment entered for each claimant for KES 491,004, totaling KES 3,437,028 for all claimants.
  • Respondent to pay costs of the suit.