[2018] KEELRC 519 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 519 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants' absence on the hearing date was due to the illness and subsequent death of their advocate, which constituted sufficient cause for non-attendance. The court also noted that there was no evidence on record to support the respondents' claim that the suit had been dismissed twice. In...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 519 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Pauline Wangare Nganga; Applicant: Moses Ndoho Njenga; Applicant: Simon Kioko Mule; Applicant: Jonathan Mwaluko; Applicant: James Mungai Kungu; Respondent: County Government of Kajiado; Respondent: Ministry of Devolution & Planning through the Hon. Attorney General
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 2463 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Application for Reinstatement of Suit After Dismissal
Outcome
application allowed; suit reinstated
Judges
MSA Makhandia
Legal Topics
Reinstatement of Suit, Dismissal for Non Attendance, Adjournment Fees, Court Registry Errors
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Reinstatement of Suit Dismissal for Non Attendance Adjournment Fees Court Registry Errors

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pauline Wangare Nganga

Applicant

Moses Ndoho Njenga

Applicant

Simon Kioko Mule

Applicant

Jonathan Mwaluko

Applicant

James Mungai Kungu

Applicant

County Government of Kajiado

Respondent

Ministry of Devolution & Planning through the Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Application for Reinstatement of Suit After Dismissal

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be reinstated after dismissal for non-attendance.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants have provided sufficient cause for non-attendance on the hearing date.
  3. 3 Whether the claimants complied with previous court orders regarding adjournment fees.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants' absence on the hearing date was due to the illness and subsequent death of their advocate, which constituted sufficient cause for non-attendance. The court also noted that there was no evidence on record to support the respondents' claim that the suit had been dismissed twice. In the absence of proof of repeated dismissals and given the exceptional circumstances of the advocate's illness, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application for reinstatement. The court further directed the parties to comply with timelines for filing witness statements and agreed issues to facilitate a hearing on the merits.

Court Disposition

application allowed; suit reinstated

Orders

  • The application dated 20 August 2018 is allowed.
  • The suit ELRC C/2463/2012 is reinstated.