[2007] KEHC 564 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 564 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, namely that their counsel was not present when judgment was delivered and only received instructions and the necessary documents after the appeal period had expired. The delay was not inordinate, and the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] KEHC 564 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Peter Andayi; Plaintiff: Isaiah Anganga; Defendant: Joseph Kibunja; Defendant: Simba Colt Motors
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? Appli40 of 2007
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
Application allowed. Leave granted to file appeal out of time.
Judges
JL Osiemo
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Extension of Time, Appeals Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Out of Time Extension of Time Appeals Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Andayi

Plaintiff

Isaiah Anganga

Plaintiff

Joseph Kibunja

Defendant

Simba Colt Motors

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicants should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time against the judgment and decree of the Principal Magistrate.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing the appeal was inordinate or excusable.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, namely that their counsel was not present when judgment was delivered and only received instructions and the necessary documents after the appeal period had expired. The delay was not inordinate, and the application was unopposed. Exercising its discretion, the court granted leave to file the appeal out of time, finding that the interests of justice would be served by allowing the applicants to be heard on appeal.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Leave granted to file appeal out of time.

Orders

  • Applicants to lodge their appeals within 14 days of this ruling.