[2016] KEELRC 1310 (KLR)

[2016] KEELRC 1310 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant had failed to take any steps to serve or prosecute the claim for over three years since filing. Despite public and specific hearing notices, neither party appeared or was represented at the hearing. In accordance with the court's mandate to manage its docket and clear backlog, and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEELRC 1310 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Peter Bob Oyoo; Respondent: The Hon. Attorney General (sued on behalf of the Ministry of State for Provincial Administration & Internal Security)
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1439 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Dismissal for Non Prosecution
Outcome
cause dismissed for non-attendance and want of prosecution
Judges
MSA Makhandia
Legal Topics
Pension Arrears, Dismissal for Non Prosecution
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Pension Arrears Dismissal for Non Prosecution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Bob Oyoo

Claimant

The Hon. Attorney General (sued on behalf of the Ministry of State for Provincial Administration & Internal Security)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ruling on Dismissal for Non Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the cause should be dismissed for want of prosecution and non-attendance by the parties.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant had failed to take any steps to serve or prosecute the claim for over three years since filing. Despite public and specific hearing notices, neither party appeared or was represented at the hearing. In accordance with the court's mandate to manage its docket and clear backlog, and pursuant to the applicable procedural rules, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the cause for want of prosecution and non-attendance.

Court Disposition

cause dismissed for non-attendance and want of prosecution

Orders

  • This Cause is dismissed for non-attendance and non-prosecution as no steps have been taken for over 3 years.