[1999] KECA 57 (KLR)

[1999] KECA 57 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient cause for the delay in filing his appeal, as the failure to file was due to the inaction of his advocate rather than any fault of the applicant. The court noted that the intended appeal was not based on frivolous grounds, as it raised arguable...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1999] KECA 57 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Peter Bunduki; Respondent: Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Application 4 of 1998
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time; Reference From Single Judge to Full Bench
Outcome
application allowed; order of single judge set aside; leave to appeal out of time granted
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Conviction and Sentence, Appellate Jurisdiction
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Out of Time Conviction and Sentence Appellate Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Bunduki

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time; Reference From Single Judge to Full Bench

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal out of time against conviction and sentence for manslaughter.
  2. 2 Whether the failure of the applicant's advocate to file the appeal constitutes sufficient cause for extension of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient cause for the delay in filing his appeal, as the failure to file was due to the inaction of his advocate rather than any fault of the applicant. The court noted that the intended appeal was not based on frivolous grounds, as it raised arguable points regarding the sufficiency of evidence and the consideration of extraneous matters by the trial judge. In the interests of justice, the court set aside the single judge's order dismissing the application and granted the applicant leave to file the notice of appeal and related documents within specified timeframes. The court emphasized that litigants should not be...

Court Disposition

application allowed; order of single judge set aside; leave to appeal out of time granted

Orders

  • The order of the single judge dismissing the application is set aside.
  • The applicant is granted leave to file the notice of appeal within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order.