[2010] KEHC 1185 (KLR)

[2010] KEHC 1185 (KLR)

The court found that, in the absence of any response from the 1st to 4th respondents and in view of the petitioners' application under Rule 20, it was appropriate to issue conservatory orders to preserve the suit properties. The court exercised its discretion to ensure that the subject matter of the petition is not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] KEHC 1185 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Peter Butali; Applicant: Jackson Mungai Mwaura; Applicant: Paul Ngugi Muchai & 34 Others; Respondent: The District Land Registrar Thika District; Respondent: The Chief Registrar of Titles; Respondent: The Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Roads and Public Works; Respondent: The Honourable Attorney General; Respondent: Viewland Investments Company Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 20 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application; Ruling on Conservatory Orders
Outcome
Conservatory orders granted to preserve the suit properties pending hearing and determination of the petition.
Legal Topics
Conservatory Orders, Protection of Fundamental Rights, Land Title Disputes
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Land and Property Conservatory Orders Protection of Fundamental Rights Land Title Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Butali

Applicant

Jackson Mungai Mwaura

Applicant

Paul Ngugi Muchai & 34 Others

Applicant

The District Land Registrar Thika District

Respondent

The Chief Registrar of Titles

Respondent

The Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Roads and Public Works

Respondent

The Honourable Attorney General

Respondent

Viewland Investments Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application; Ruling on Conservatory Orders

  1. 1 Whether conservatory orders should be issued to preserve the suit properties pending the hearing and determination of the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, in the absence of any response from the 1st to 4th respondents and in view of the petitioners' application under Rule 20, it was appropriate to issue conservatory orders to preserve the suit properties. The court exercised its discretion to ensure that the subject matter of the petition is not rendered nugatory and that the rights claimed by the petitioners are not prejudiced before the petition is heard and determined. The order was made to conserve the suit properties until the case is heard and determined or until further orders of the court.

Court Disposition

Conservatory orders granted to preserve the suit properties pending hearing and determination of the petition.

Orders

  • An order is issued to conserve the suit properties until the case is heard and determined, or until any further or other orders.