[2014] KEELRC 1227 (KLR)

[2014] KEELRC 1227 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had demonstrated sufficient cause for not filing their employment claims within the prescribed limitation period. The existence of ongoing criminal proceedings, which arose from the same facts as their employment termination, constituted a valid reason for the delay. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEELRC 1227 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Peter Dan Oruko & 9 Others; Respondent: Chemilil Sugar Company Ltd
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 4 - 13 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Out of Time
Outcome
leave to file out of time granted
Judges
HS Wasilwa
Legal Topics
Limitation of Actions, Leave to File Out of Time, Termination of Employment, Criminal Proceedings Effect, Procedural Law
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Limitation of Actions Leave to File Out of Time Termination of Employment Criminal Proceedings Effect Procedural Law

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Dan Oruko & 9 Others

Applicant

Chemilil Sugar Company Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicants should be granted leave to file their employment claims out of time due to pending criminal proceedings.
  2. 2 Whether the existence of criminal cases justified the delay in filing the employment claims.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had demonstrated sufficient cause for not filing their employment claims within the prescribed limitation period. The existence of ongoing criminal proceedings, which arose from the same facts as their employment termination, constituted a valid reason for the delay. The court exercised its discretion under Section 28 of the Limitation of Actions Act to grant leave to the applicants to file their claims out of time, provided they do so within three months from the date of the ruling.

Court Disposition

leave to file out of time granted

Orders

  • Applicants are granted leave to file their causes out of time.
  • Such causes must be filed within three months from the date of this ruling.