[2012] KEHC 5817 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 5817 (KLR)

The court held that since Justice Nambuye's review proceedings before the Vetting Board were still pending and no decision on the review had been published, she was not deemed removed as a judge under the Constitution. Therefore, it was proper and lawful for the court to deliver the judgment written and signed by...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] KEHC 5817 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Peter Denis Mbwali; Plaintiff: John Kipsigei Kitur; Defendant: Kenya Literature Bureau
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 230 of 2000
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Propriety of Delivering Judgment by Another Judge
Outcome
Court satisfied of propriety to deliver judgment written and signed by Justice Nambuye; judgment to be delivered.
Judges
DAS Majanja
Legal Topics
Judicial Vetting, Judgment Delivery, Judicial Officer Status
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Judicial Vetting Judgment Delivery Judicial Officer Status

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Denis Mbwali

Plaintiff

John Kipsigei Kitur

Plaintiff

Kenya Literature Bureau

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Propriety of Delivering Judgment by Another Judge

  1. 1 Whether it is proper for a judge to deliver a judgment written and signed by another judge who is subject to removal proceedings.
  2. 2 Whether a judge under review by the Vetting Board is still deemed a judge under the Constitution until the review is determined.
  3. 3 Whether parties should be denied access to judgment due to pending vetting proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since Justice Nambuye's review proceedings before the Vetting Board were still pending and no decision on the review had been published, she was not deemed removed as a judge under the Constitution. Therefore, it was proper and lawful for the court to deliver the judgment written and signed by her. The court further emphasized that access to justice, as protected by Article 48 of the Constitution, requires that parties should not be kept waiting for judgments due to pending vetting proceedings, as long as the judge's removal is not finalized.

Court Disposition

Court satisfied of propriety to deliver judgment written and signed by Justice Nambuye; judgment to be delivered.

Orders

  • The court will proceed to deliver the judgment written and signed by Justice Nambuye.