[2002] KECA 244 (KLR)

[2002] KECA 244 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had filed the notice of appeal within the prescribed time but failed to serve it on the respondents within seven days as required by rule 76 of the Court of Appeal Rules. The reason for non-compliance was inadvertence by counsel, which the court accepted as a genuine error. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] KECA 244 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Peter G. N. Ng'ang'a; Respondent: Standard Chartered Bank of Kenya Ltd; Respondent: Harrison Maina Kariuki
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 248 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Extension of Time Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Serve Notice of Appeal
Outcome
application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal, Court of Appeal Rules, Service of Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Notice of Appeal Court of Appeal Rules Service of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter G. N. Ng'ang'a

Applicant

Standard Chartered Bank of Kenya Ltd

Respondent

Harrison Maina Kariuki

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Extension of Time Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Serve Notice of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to serve the notice of appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether inadvertence of counsel constitutes sufficient reason for extension of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had filed the notice of appeal within the prescribed time but failed to serve it on the respondents within seven days as required by rule 76 of the Court of Appeal Rules. The reason for non-compliance was inadvertence by counsel, which the court accepted as a genuine error. The court saw no reason not to exercise its discretion in favour of the applicant, holding that the interests of justice would be served by granting the extension. Accordingly, the application for extension of time was allowed, and the applicant was ordered to serve the notice of appeal within four days from the date of the ruling.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • The applicant shall serve the notice of appeal already lodged to the respondents within 4 days from the date of this ruling.