[2018] KEELC 4459 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 4459 (KLR)

The court found that the subdivisions of LR No. Kiganjo/Gatei/50 and the issuance of new titles (Kiganjo/Gatei 2139-2141) occurred on 23rd December 2004, while the stay orders were only obtained on 4th March 2016, twelve years later. As such, the stay orders could not retrospectively affect the validity of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 4459 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Peter Githiu Komu; Respondent: Peter Chege Ndua
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal 26 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
application dismissed; file transferred to Thika ELC Court
Legal Topics
Land Title Cancellation, Subdivision of Land, Appeals Procedure
Source Language
en
Land and Property Land Title Cancellation Subdivision of Land Appeals Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Githiu Komu

Appellant

Peter Chege Ndua

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the District Land Registrar Gatundu should be ordered to cancel title Nos. Kiganjo/Gatei 2139-2141 arising from LR No. Kiganjo/Gatei/50.
  2. 2 Whether the application for cancellation of title is properly before the court given the procedural history and incomplete record of appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the stay orders obtained after the subdivisions can affect titles already issued.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the subdivisions of LR No. Kiganjo/Gatei/50 and the issuance of new titles (Kiganjo/Gatei 2139-2141) occurred on 23rd December 2004, while the stay orders were only obtained on 4th March 2016, twelve years later. As such, the stay orders could not retrospectively affect the validity of the subdivisions or the resulting titles. Furthermore, the applicant's record of appeal was incomplete, lacking essential pages and documents, making it procedurally improper to entertain the application for cancellation of title at this stage. The court also noted confusion regarding the case numbers and judgments being appealed, further undermining the application. Consequently, the...

Court Disposition

application dismissed; file transferred to Thika ELC Court

Orders

  • The applicant's application dated 15th March, 2017 is dismissed with no order as to costs.
  • The file is to be transferred to Thika ELC Court for hearing and disposal of the appeal.