[2017] KEHC 9075 (KLR)
The court found that there was an accidental slip or omission in the previous ruling dated 17th May 2017 regarding the description of the orders affecting the estate property. Exercising its powers under section 99 of the Civil Procedure Act, the court amended paragraph 6 to clarify the cancellation of specific land...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 9075 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Kabui Mbatia; Applicant: Anastasia Wanjiku Kabui; Respondent: Elizabeth Njeri Mbatia; Respondent: Simon Thairu Mbatia
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 2927 of 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Amendment of Previous Ruling
- Outcome
- Amendment of previous ruling granted; orders clarified and injunction issued.
- Judges
- AO Muchelule
- Legal Topics
- Succession, Estate Administration, Fiduciary Duties
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Kabui Mbatia
Applicant
Anastasia Wanjiku Kabui
Applicant
Elizabeth Njeri Mbatia
Respondent
Simon Thairu Mbatia
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Amendment of Previous Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the previous ruling required amendment under section 99 of the Civil Procedure Act to correct errors in the description of orders regarding the estate property.
- 2 Whether the fiduciary position was abused, warranting cancellation of certain land titles and reversion to the estate.
- 3 Whether an injunction should issue restraining the 1st respondent and other beneficiaries from disposing of or alienating the estate property.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there was an accidental slip or omission in the previous ruling dated 17th May 2017 regarding the description of the orders affecting the estate property. Exercising its powers under section 99 of the Civil Procedure Act, the court amended paragraph 6 to clarify the cancellation of specific land titles and their reversion to the estate in the name of the 1st respondent. The court also amended paragraph 8 to issue an injunction restraining the 1st respondent and other beneficiaries from disposing of or alienating the estate property pending further orders. The amendments were necessary to accurately reflect the court's intention and to protect the integrity of the...
Court Disposition
Amendment of previous ruling granted; orders clarified and injunction issued.
Orders
- Paragraph 6 of the ruling dated 17th May 2017 is amended to order cancellation of titles Dagoretti/Riruta/6339, 6340, 6341, 6342 and 6343 and reversion to Dagoretti/Riruta/4654 in the name of the 1st respondent.
- Paragraph 8 is amended to issue an injunction restraining the 1st respondent and other beneficiaries from disposing of or alienating parcel 4654 or any portion of it.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
FAMILY DIVISION
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 2927 OF 1999
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JONATHAN MBATIA KIEYA - (DECEASED)
PETER KABUI MBATIA......................................1ST APPLICANT
ANASTASIA WANJIKU KABUI........................2ND APPLICANT
VERSUS
ELIZABETH NJERI MBATIA.........................1ST RESPONDENT
SIMON THAIRU MBATIA...............................2ND RESPONDENT
RULING
1. Having been brought to my attention through letter from Julius Nyakiangana & Co. Advocates, and under section 99 of the Civil Procedure Act, I amend paragraph 6 of the Ruling dated 17th May 2017 to read:-
“It is because of this abuse of this fiduciary position that I order the cancellation of titles Dagoretti/ Riruta/6339, 6340, 6341, 6342 and 6343 and order that the portions revert to Dagoretti/Riruta/4654 in the name of the 1st respondent.”
And paragraph 8 to read –
“In the meantime, an injunction shall issue against the 1st respondent and/or the other beneficiaries restraining them from disposing of, or in any other manner, alienating parcel 4654, or any portion of it.”
2. Counsel shall serve all parties with the amended ruling.
DATED, DELIVERED and SIGNED at NAIROBI this 15TH day of JUNE 2017.
A.O. MUCHELULE
JUDGE