[2019] KEELC 3019 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 3019 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated apprehension of substantial loss if the stay was not granted, as the lower court's judgment ordered immediate cancellation of his title to the suit land. The applicant expressed readiness to provide security and had brought the application without undue delay. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 3019 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Peter Kaimbi; Respondent: Gedion M’Ithima; Respondent: John Kiogora Mugambi; Respondent: Morris Kiruja Ithima
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 78 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
Interim stay of execution granted subject to deposit of security; matter to proceed for inter partes hearing.
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Security for Due Performance, Appeals From Subordinate Courts, Cancellation of Title, Substantial Loss, Preservation of Status Quo
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Stay of Execution Security for Due Performance Appeals From Subordinate Courts Cancellation of Title Substantial Loss Preservation of Status Quo

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Kaimbi

Appellant

Gedion M’Ithima

Respondent

John Kiogora Mugambi

Respondent

Morris Kiruja Ithima

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has satisfied the conditions for grant of stay of execution pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant will suffer substantial loss if stay is not granted.
  3. 3 Whether security for due performance should be ordered as a condition for stay.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated apprehension of substantial loss if the stay was not granted, as the lower court's judgment ordered immediate cancellation of his title to the suit land. The applicant expressed readiness to provide security and had brought the application without undue delay. The court exercised its discretion to grant a temporary stay of execution of the judgment, conditional upon the applicant depositing Kshs. 300,000 as security within 21 days, failing which the stay would lapse. The court declined to certify the matter as urgent but directed that it be heard on a priority basis and ordered service of the application on the respondents.

Court Disposition

Interim stay of execution granted subject to deposit of security; matter to proceed for inter partes hearing.

Orders

  • Prayer 2 for temporary stay of execution of the judgment in Nkubu PM ELC Case No. 39 of 2017 is granted pending hearing and determination of the application, subject to the applicant depositing Kshs. 300,000 as security within 21 days.
  • If the applicant fails to deposit the security within 21 days, the stay of execution will automatically lapse.