https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/6056

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/6056

By consent, and noting the straightforward operation of section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the court ordered that the pre-sentence custody period from 5 February 2009 to 17 November 2009 be credited against the sentence.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 6056 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Peter Kamau Wanjiru; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E326 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Notice of Motion Application
Outcome
Application allowed by consent.
Judges
["B Mwamuye"]
Legal Topics
Sentence Computation, Section 333(2) Credit for Pre Sentence Custody, Revision Application by Consent
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Sentence Computation Section 333(2) Credit for Pre Sentence Custody Revision Application by Consent

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Kamau Wanjiru

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Notice of Motion Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant was entitled to have the period spent in custody before sentence credited in computing the sentence under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Ratio Decidendi

By consent, and noting the straightforward operation of section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the court ordered that the pre-sentence custody period from 5 February 2009 to 17 November 2009 be credited against the sentence.

Court Disposition

Application allowed by consent.

Orders

  • The period from 5 February 2009 to 17 November 2009 shall be factored into the sentence pursuant to section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
  • The application is fully determined.