[2007] KECA 191 (KLR)
The Court of Appeal held that the sentence of twelve years imprisonment for manslaughter was appropriate and not manifestly excessive, given the gravity of the offence, the lack of provocation, and the appellant's use of a lethal weapon over a frivolous demand. The appellant's intoxication and subsequent illnesses...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] KECA 191 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Peter Kibet Chepkwony; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 61 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Judges
- AM Githinji
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Sentencing Principles, Plea of Guilty
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Kibet Chepkwony
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of twelve years imprisonment for manslaughter was harsh or manifestly excessive.
- 2 Whether the appellant's intoxication and subsequent illnesses in prison warranted a reduction of sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that the sentence of twelve years imprisonment for manslaughter was appropriate and not manifestly excessive, given the gravity of the offence, the lack of provocation, and the appellant's use of a lethal weapon over a frivolous demand. The appellant's intoxication and subsequent illnesses in prison did not constitute sufficient grounds for reducing the sentence. The court found no reason to interfere with the sentence imposed by the High Court and dismissed the appeal as lacking merit.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAKURU
Criminal Appeal 61 of 2006
PETER KIBET CHEPKWONY …………..… APPELLANT
AND
REPUBLIC ……………………………….RESPONDENT
(Appeal from a sentence of the High Court of Kenya Nakuru (Mr. Justice L. Kimaru) dated 22nd February, 2003
In
H.C.CR.C. NO. 124 OF 2003)
***************
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
The appellant, Peter Kibet Chepkwony, was convicted on his own plea of guilty of manslaughter by the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru, Kimaru, J. on 22nd February, 2006 and was sentenced to twelve (12) years imprisonment. This is his first and final appeal on sentence.
The appellant complains that the sentence imposed upon him is harsh and should be appropriately reduced because he was very drunk when he killed the deceased, his elder brother, and that in prison he has suffered multiple and frequent illnesses.
On the material day at about 6. 30 p.m. the deceased was relaxing on a seat outside his house when the appellant arrived and demanded fare to travel to Narok for an undisclosed mission. The deceased was unable to produce any money and this apparently infuriated the appellant who rushed to pick an axe with which he hacked the deceased chopping off his head.
There was no reason whatsoever for the appellant to resort to the use of a lethal weapon. Moreover, the cause of the attack could not be visited upon the deceased since, in the first place, the money the appellant was demanding did not belong to him. The deceased appears to have lost a precious life due to a frivolous demand by the appellant.
The sentence was merited in the circumstances and there is no reason for us to interfere with it because it is neither harsh nor manifestly excessive.
This appeal is without merit and is hereby ordered dismissed.
Dated and delivered at Nakuru this 25th day of September, 2007.
P. K. TUNOI
……………………….
JUDGE OF APPEAL
E. M. GITHINJI
………………………
JUDGE OF APPEAL
W. S. DEVERELL
………………………
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR