[2010] KEHC 2126 (KLR)

[2010] KEHC 2126 (KLR)

The court found that the affidavit of service relied upon to grant the ex-parte injunction was disowned by the purported deponent, Ominde Daniel, who denied both serving the application and swearing the affidavit. The respondent, Peter Kihara Kuria, subsequently changed his account regarding who effected service,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] KEHC 2126 (KLR)
Parties
Respondent: Peter Kihara Kuria; Applicant: Hannah Nyambura Kuria
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 83 of 1994
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Injunction
Outcome
Ex-parte injunction set aside; matter referred for criminal investigation.
Legal Topics
Service of Process, Ex Parte Orders, Injunctions, Affidavit Evidence
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Service of Process Ex Parte Orders Injunctions Affidavit Evidence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Kihara Kuria

Respondent

Hannah Nyambura Kuria

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the respondent was properly served with the application for injunction.
  2. 2 Whether the affidavit of service relied upon was valid and truthful.
  3. 3 Whether the ex-parte injunction should be set aside due to lack of service.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the affidavit of service relied upon to grant the ex-parte injunction was disowned by the purported deponent, Ominde Daniel, who denied both serving the application and swearing the affidavit. The respondent, Peter Kihara Kuria, subsequently changed his account regarding who effected service, further undermining the credibility of the service. In light of these inconsistencies and the lack of proper service, the court determined that the ex-parte injunction was improperly obtained. The court directed the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) to investigate the circumstances surrounding the false affidavit and to take appropriate action against the person responsible...

Court Disposition

Ex-parte injunction set aside; matter referred for criminal investigation.

Orders

  • The Criminal Investigation Department (CID) is directed to investigate the swearing and filing of the affidavit of service dated 18th November 2009 and filed on 19th November 2009.
  • Appropriate action to be taken against whoever is found responsible for the false affidavit.