[2014] KEHC 3970 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 3970 (KLR)

The court held that the Land Disputes Tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain disputes over land with a registered title deed, as confirmed by the Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee. Consequently, the subordinate court erred in adopting the Tribunal's award. The proper legal position is that where a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 3970 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Peter Kimani Jackson Migwi; Respondent: Grace Nyambura Migwi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 95 'A' of 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed. Judgment of the subordinate court set aside. No order as to costs.
Judges
A Ombwayo
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Land Disputes Tribunal, Land Title Disputes, Adoption of Tribunal Awards
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Jurisdiction of Land Disputes Tribunal Land Title Disputes Adoption of Tribunal Awards

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Kimani Jackson Migwi

Appellant

Grace Nyambura Migwi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Land Disputes Tribunal had jurisdiction over land with a registered title.
  2. 2 Whether the subordinate court erred in adopting the Tribunal's award despite the Appeals Committee's finding of lack of jurisdiction.
  3. 3 Whether the Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee's decision should prevail.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the Land Disputes Tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain disputes over land with a registered title deed, as confirmed by the Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee. Consequently, the subordinate court erred in adopting the Tribunal's award. The proper legal position is that where a tribunal lacks jurisdiction, any award or decision it makes is a nullity and cannot be adopted or enforced by a court. The court set aside the judgment entered in terms of the Tribunal's award and affirmed the Appeals Committee's decision that there was no award to be adopted. The court further noted that, although the applicant could have sought judicial review, Article 159 of the...

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed. Judgment of the subordinate court set aside. No order as to costs.

Orders

  • The judgment entered in Murang'a Land Disputes Tribunal Case No.10 of 2009 is set aside.
  • Judgment is entered in terms of the Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee decision that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction over land with a title, and there is no award to be adopted.