[1997] KECA 224 (KLR)

[1997] KECA 224 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant was personally responsible for multiple lapses and omissions in prosecuting the intended appeal, including filing a similar application in the wrong court, delayed instructions to his advocate, and late dispatch of the letter requesting proceedings. The court emphasized that a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1997] KECA 224 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Peter Kimani Ngubu; Respondent: Salome Gathoni Chege
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 8 of 1997
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal, Record of Appeal, Appellate Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Notice of Appeal Record of Appeal Appellate Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Kimani Ngubu

Applicant

Salome Gathoni Chege

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient reasons to warrant extension of time to file a Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the lapses and omissions by the applicant justify the exercise of the court's discretion in his favour.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was personally responsible for multiple lapses and omissions in prosecuting the intended appeal, including filing a similar application in the wrong court, delayed instructions to his advocate, and late dispatch of the letter requesting proceedings. The court emphasized that a Notice of Appeal does not require the prior receipt of proceedings or judgment. After considering all facts and submissions, the court was not persuaded that the applicant had provided sufficient or convincing reasons to justify the exercise of discretion in his favour. Consequently, the application for extension of time was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application for extension of time to file Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal out of time is dismissed with costs.