[2016] KEELC 50 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff and defendants are registered as absolute proprietors of the suit land, each entitled to an equal share. The plaintiff demonstrated that consent for partition had been obtained but the defendants' refusal to cooperate was unjustified. The court held that the plaintiff is entitled...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEELC 50 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Peter Kimely Kipsang; Defendant: Kibiyego Arap Kipsang; Defendant: Philip Kipkemboi Arap Sang; Defendant: Michael Kibet Arap Sang
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 114 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Land and Property Suit / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim allowed; orders for partition and registration granted.
- Judges
- A Ombwayo
- Legal Topics
- Partition of Land, Co Ownership, Registration of Title, Family Land Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Kimely Kipsang
Plaintiff
Kibiyego Arap Kipsang
Defendant
Philip Kipkemboi Arap Sang
Defendant
Michael Kibet Arap Sang
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to partition of parcel Nandi/Ndubeneti/224 and registration of his portion in his name.
- 2 Whether the defendants' refusal to cooperate with the partition process is justified.
- 3 Whether the Deputy Registrar should be empowered to execute documents to facilitate partition and registration.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff and defendants are registered as absolute proprietors of the suit land, each entitled to an equal share. The plaintiff demonstrated that consent for partition had been obtained but the defendants' refusal to cooperate was unjustified. The court held that the plaintiff is entitled to partition and registration of his portion. To ensure the orders are effected, the Deputy Registrar is empowered to execute all necessary documents to facilitate the partition, transfer, and registration of 3.05 hectares in the plaintiff's name. The court declined to award costs due to the family nature of the dispute.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim allowed; orders for partition and registration granted.
Orders
- The parcel of land Nandi/Ndubeneti/224 shall be partitioned to enable the plaintiff to have his portion registered in his name.
- The Deputy Registrar of the High Court is authorized to execute all relevant documents to facilitate the partitioning, transfer, and registration of 3.05 hectares in the name of the plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT OF KENYA
AT ELDORET
E & L CASE NO. 114 OF 2015
PETER KIMELY KIPSANG...........................................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
KIBIYEGO ARAP KIPSANG.............................................1ST DEFENDANT
PHILIP KIPKEMBOI ARAP SANG.................................2ND DEFENDANT
MICHAEL KIBET ARAP SANG......................................3RD DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
Peter Kimely Kipsang, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff has sued Kibiyego Arap Kipsang, Philip Kipkemboi Arap Sang and Michael Kibet Arap Sangclaiming that he and the defendants are all registered/proprietors in common of parcel of Nandi/Ndubeneti/224 measuring approximately 12. 2 hectares which is a family land, and which they inherited after their father passed away. The interest of each one of them is a ¼ of undivided share of the parcel Nandi/Ndubeneti/224. The Kilibwoni Land Control Board granted consent to have the land partitioned into four equal portions but the defendants became uncooperative to complete the partition of the land. The Kilibwoni Land Control Board granted another consent to have the same parcel of land partitioned into two portions of 3. 05 hectares and the reminder of 9. 15 hectares so that the plaintiff could have the title for his portion of 3. 05 hectares and that the plaintiff commissioned a surveyor to carry out the survey work but the defendants again became uncooperative and the plaintiff has not been able to have title for his portion. Despite several request and demand that they facilitate partitioning process, the defendants have adamantly and for no justifiable reasons refused to do so.
Reasons wherefore, the plaintiff prays for judgment against the defendants for an order of compelling the defendants to facilitate partitioning process of parcel No. Nandi/Kilibwoni/224 into the portion of 3. 05 and 9. 15 acres and an order of partition to be granted to the plaintiff to have his portion registered in his names. In the alternative, that the Deputy Registrar of High Court be granted order to execute all the relevant documents to facilitate the partitioning, transfer and registration of the property measuring 3. 05 hectares in to the name of the plaintiff. Ultimately he prays for Costs and Interest.
The defendants filed joint statement of defence whose gist is that they are registered in trust for other beneficiaries in essence, the defendants pray for subdivision of the land in five equal portions.
When the matter came for hearing on the 23. 11. 2016, the plaintiff established that the date had been taken by consent of the parties on the 3. 6.2016.
The plaintiff testified that there is a piece of land known as Nandi/Ndubeneti/224 which used to belong to their late father. The same measures 12. 2 hectares and is a family land. When their late father passed away, they inherited the land as brothers and the interest of each one of them is a ¼ of the land in question. That on 24. 10. 1974, the said land was registered into their names and a title deed issued. On 22. 9.1994, consent was granted by Kilibwoni Land Control Board to partition the land into four equal portions. Later, his brothers became uncooperative to complete the partition of the land. He commissioned a Surveyor to carry out the survey work. Again, his brothers became uncooperative and hence he cannot get his portion of land.
He has filed a suit against his brothers so that the court can grant him an order of partition and have his portion registered in his names and his 3 brothers can retain their portion in their own names. He is also asking for costs of the suit.
I have considered the pleadings and evidence on record especially the testimony of the plaintiff and do find that the plaintiff and the defendants are registered as absolute proprietors of the land comprised in title Number Nandi/Ndubeneti/224. They were registered on 24. 10. 1974 and title issued on 27. 9.2007. They twice obtained a letter of consent to partition into 4 equal portions to parcel of land No. Nandi/Ndubeneti/224 but due to family disagreement, they could not allow the surveyor to do the subdivision. The plaintiff therefore, prays for judgment.
The plaintiff has proved his case on a balance of probabilities that he is entitled to the orders sought as the said land was registered into their names on 24. 10. 1974 and a title deed issued 22. 9.1994 and that consent to partition was granted by Kilibwoni Land Control Board to partition the land into four equal portions. Later, his brothers became uncooperative to complete the partition of the land. He commissioned a Surveyor to carry out the survey work. Again, his brothers became uncooperative and hence he cannot get his portion of land. The plaintiff is entitled to the orders sought. I therefore do grant orders that the parcel of land be partitioned to enable the plaintiff to have his portion registered in his names. The Deputy Registrar of High Court to execute all the relevant documents to facilitate the partitioning, transfer and registration of the property measuring 3. 05 hectares in to the name of the plaintiff. There will be no order as to costs this being a family dispute.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT ELDORET ON 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2016.
ANTONY OMBWAYO
JUDGE