[2011] KEHC 1247 (KLR)
The court found that there was an error apparent on the face of the record in its earlier judgment, as it failed to include Cesare Kibe Kimondo as the 2nd Appellant and did not award him damages in line with the determination made for Peter Kingori Githinji. The court held that both appellants were involved in the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] KEHC 1247 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Peter Kingori Githinji; Appellant: Cesare Kibe Kimondo; Respondent: Chinga Tea Factory Company Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 41 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Review of Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for review allowed. Judgment reviewed and amended to include Cesare Kibe Kimondo as 2nd Appellant and to award him Ksh.120,000 as general damages, with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Review of Judgment, Personal Injury, Road Traffic Accidents, Damages Award
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Kingori Githinji
Appellant
Cesare Kibe Kimondo
Appellant
Chinga Tea Factory Company Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Review of Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was an error apparent on the face of the record in the court's judgment of 17th September 2010.
- 2 Whether the judgment should be reviewed to include Cesare Kibe Kimondo as the 2nd Appellant and to award him damages similar to the 1st Appellant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there was an error apparent on the face of the record in its earlier judgment, as it failed to include Cesare Kibe Kimondo as the 2nd Appellant and did not award him damages in line with the determination made for Peter Kingori Githinji. The court held that both appellants were involved in the same accident, had their cases treated as consolidated, and both were entitled to the same findings on liability and quantum of damages. The omission of the 2nd Appellant from the judgment was a clear error, justifying review under Order 45 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The court therefore amended the judgment to include Cesare Kibe Kimondo as the 2nd Appellant, found the...
Court Disposition
Application for review allowed. Judgment reviewed and amended to include Cesare Kibe Kimondo as 2nd Appellant and to award him Ksh.120,000 as general damages, with costs.
Orders
- The heading of the judgment is amended to include Cesare Kibe Kimondo as the 2nd Appellant.
- The appeal is allowed in terms of the appeal by Peter Kingori Githinji; the Respondent is found wholly liable for the accident.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLICOF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NYERI
CIVIL APPEAL 41 OF 2007
PETER KINGORI GITHINJI...............................................…......1ST APPELLANT
CESARE KIBE KIMONDO...............................................….......2ND APPELLANT
VERSUS
CHINGA TEA FACTORY COMPANY LIMITED..................................RESPONDENT
(Being appeal against the judgment of E. J. Osoro, Senior Resident Magistrate in Nyeri Chief Magistrate’s Civil Case No. 818 of 2005 delivered on 10th May 2007)
RULING
The subject matter of this ruling is the Notice of Motion dated 25th October 2010 in which the Appellants herein are seeking an order of review of this court’s judgment pronounced on 17th September 2010. The Motion is not contested by the Respondents.
It is the submission of the Appellants that there is an error apparent on record. The Appellants herein namely: Peter Kingori Githinji and Cesare Kibe Kimondo have pointed out that they were both involved in a road traffic accident while on board motor vehicle registration No. KAA 881p ON 23rd July 2002 along Mukurwe-ini-Othaya road. The aforesaid motor vehicle was the property of Chinga tea Factory co. Ltd., the respondent herein. Peter Kingori Githinji, filed Nyeri C.M.C.C. No. 818 of 2005 while Cesare Kibe Kimondo filed Nyeri C.MC.C. No. 819 of 2005 to claim damages from the respondent for the injuries they each sustained as a result of the accident. When the suits came up for hearing before E. J. Osoro, learned Senior Resident Magistrate, learned counsels appearing for the parties in both suits recorded a consent order to taken evidence in respect of liability in Nyeri C.M.C.C. No. 818 of 2005 and to use that as the test case for Nyeri C.M.C.C.C. No. 819 of 2005. It would appear that the parties treated that consent order as an order consolidating the two suits. The learned Senior Resident Magistrate heard the ‘consolidated suit’ and dismissed it on 10th May 2007. The Appellants herein were aggrieved hence they were prompted to file this appeal. The appeal was heard and determined on 17th September 2010. The gist of this Court’s judgment was that the order dismissing the suit was set aside. The issue touching on liability was determined whereof the Respondent herein was held wholly responsible for the accident. This Court treated the appeal as if it was solely filed by Peter Kingori Githinji. That in my view is an error which is apparent on the face of record. The judgment of 17th September 2010 should be amended to include the name of Cesare Kibe Kimondo as the 2nd Appellant. In his Plaint, Cesare Kibe Kimondo had indicated that he suffered the following injuries:
(i)Blunt injury to the right knee.
(ii)Blunt injury to the chest and ribs.
(iii)Blunt injury to the hips.
In her judgment, the learned Senior Resident Magistrate awarded Cesare Kibe Kimondo Ksh.50,000/= as general damages which amount was similar to that of Peter Kingori Githinji. After a careful re-consideration of the appeal, this court set aside the award and raised the figure to Ksh.120,000/=. I will equally do the same in respect of the case of Cesare Kibe Kimondo.
In the end I allow the Motion dated 25th October 2011 and order this judgment be reviewed and amended as follows:
(i)That the heading be amended to include Cesare Kibe Kimondo as the 2nd Appellant.
(ii)The appeal be allowed in terms of the appeal by Peter Kingori Githinji i.e. that is to say that the Respondent is found to be wholly liable for the accident and that the 2nd Appellant be awarded Ksh.120,000/= as general damages with costs of the appeal and the suit.
Dated and delivered at Nyeri this 23rd day of September 2011.
J. K. SERGON
JUDGE
In open court in the presence of Mr. Mugambi for Respondent and no appearance Wahito for the Appellant.