[2018] KEHC 5494 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 5494 (KLR)

The court found that the appellants had filed the application for stay of execution timeously and had demonstrated a risk of substantial loss if the decretal sum was paid out and the appeal subsequently succeeded, as the respondent's ability to refund was in question. The court balanced the interests of both parties...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 5494 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Peter Kusimba Nyongesa; Appellant: Grace Muroria; Respondent: Willy Muli Musyoka Maati
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 543 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
conditional stay of execution granted pending appeal
Judges
A Mbogholi-Msagha
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Appeal Procedure, Irreparable Loss, Security for Decretal Sum
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Appeal Procedure Irreparable Loss Security for Decretal Sum

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Kusimba Nyongesa

Appellant

Grace Muroria

Appellant

Willy Muli Musyoka Maati

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellants have satisfied the conditions for grant of stay of execution pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the appellants will suffer irreparable and substantial loss if stay is not granted.
  3. 3 What security, if any, should be provided for the due performance of the decree.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellants had filed the application for stay of execution timeously and had demonstrated a risk of substantial loss if the decretal sum was paid out and the appeal subsequently succeeded, as the respondent's ability to refund was in question. The court balanced the interests of both parties by granting a conditional stay: the appellants were required to pay the respondent Kshs. 1 million and deposit the balance of the decretal sum in an interest earning account in the names of both advocates within 30 days. This approach secured the respondent's interests while preserving the appellants' right of appeal.

Court Disposition

conditional stay of execution granted pending appeal

Orders

  • The appellants shall pay the respondent Kshs. 1,000,000.
  • The appellants shall deposit the balance of the decretal sum in an interest earning account in the names of both advocates within 30 days from the date of this ruling.