[2010] KEHC 450 (KLR)
The court found that the ground of anticipated delay in hearing the appeal was not justified, as the appeal had already been set down for hearing. While the appellant's arguments regarding the illegality of the sentence and ambiguity in the charge were considered correct, the court also took into account the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 450 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Peter Leposo Lekaai; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 136 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application for bail pending appeal rejected
- Judges
- JW Lessit
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Sentencing Illegality, Appeal Success Probability
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Leposo Lekaai
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant should be granted bail pending appeal under section 357 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- 2 Whether the appeal has overwhelming chances of success.
- 3 Whether anticipated delay in hearing the appeal justifies granting bail.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the ground of anticipated delay in hearing the appeal was not justified, as the appeal had already been set down for hearing. While the appellant's arguments regarding the illegality of the sentence and ambiguity in the charge were considered correct, the court also took into account the circumstances of the offence, specifically that the appellant was arrested in possession of the complainant's ID card while attempting to withdraw money. The court concluded that although the appeal may be arguable, this does not guarantee release on bail pending appeal. Consequently, the application for bail was rejected.
Court Disposition
application for bail pending appeal rejected
Orders
- The application for bail pending appeal is rejected.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MERU
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 136 OF 2010
LESIIT, J
PETER LEPOSO LEKAAI……………………………………..APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC…………………………………………………….RESPONDENT
(From Original Conviction & Sentence of SRM’s Case No.1185 of 2007 Chuka; P. Ngare; Ag SRM)
RULING
The appellant has filed an application under S357 of the CPC seeking to be released on bail pending his appeal. The application is not opposed.
The applicant/appellant was sentenced to serve several prison terms which were to run concurrently. The longest sentence was the one for five years imprisonment. The Appellant relies on two grounds in his application one that this appeal has an overwhelming chance of success. Two that if bond is not granted he is likely to serve the entire sentence before his appeal is heard.
In CHIMAMBAI V REPUBLIC 1971 EA 343
1. It was held that;
“Anticipated delay in the hearing of the appeal together with other factors could constitute good grounds for granting bail pending appeal.”
The ground that there will be delay in hearing the appeal is not justified as the appeal has already been set down for hearing on 23rd March 2011.
In regard to the likelihood of the success of the appeal, I have considered submissions by Mr. Gitonga. He stated that the sentence in count 2 was illegal for being more severe than provided in law by double the period provided in regard to count 4, counsel urged that the section under which the applicant was charged had two limbs and that it was not indicated under which one he was charged. Both arguments are correct. However other circumstances must also be considered. The applicant was arrested red handed with an id card of the complainant trying to withdraw money from his account. The applicant’s appeal may be arguable but that is no guarantee it may lead to his release. The application is therefore rejected.
Dated at Meru this 9th day of December 2010
LESIIT
JUDGE