[2007] KECA 52 (KLR)
The Court of Appeal held that the sentence of ten years imprisonment for manslaughter was not manifestly excessive in the circumstances. The appellant had admitted to stabbing his son twice, resulting in death, following a domestic quarrel. The trial judge had properly considered all relevant factors, including the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] KECA 52 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Peter Maina Ndirangu; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 37 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Sentencing, Appeal Dismissal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Maina Ndirangu
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of ten years imprisonment for manslaughter was manifestly excessive and warranted appellate intervention.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that the sentence of ten years imprisonment for manslaughter was not manifestly excessive in the circumstances. The appellant had admitted to stabbing his son twice, resulting in death, following a domestic quarrel. The trial judge had properly considered all relevant factors, including the appellant's admission and the facts of the case. The appellate court found no error in principle or justification to interfere with the sentence imposed by the High Court. Accordingly, the appeal lacked merit and was dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
COURT OF APPEAL
AT NAKURU
CRIMINAL APPEAL 37 OF 2006
PETER MAINA NDIRANGU…………………………………………APPELLANT
AND
REPUBLIC………………………..………..……………………….RESPONDENT
(Appeal from a sentence of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru (Muga Apondi, J) dated 19th October, 2005
in
H.C.CR.C. NO 1O. OF 2005
**************************
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
The appellant killed his own son. He came home drunk and picked up a quarrel with his wife over food. The son intervened and according to the facts which the appellant admitted, he ran into his house and armed himself with a Somali sword. He stabbed the son on the stomach and the son started to run away. The appellant chased him and stabbed him again on the back. Taking all these factors into account, the learned trial Judge sentenced the appellant to ten years imprisonment following the conviction on the lesser charge of manslaughter which the appellant eventually admitted. Taking everything into account, we are far from being satisfied that in all the circumstances of the case, the sentence of ten years is so manifestly excessive and calls for the intervention of the Court. In our view the sentence was well merited. There is no merit in this appeal and we order that it be and is hereby dismissed.
Dated at Nakuru this 24th day of September 2007.
R. S. C. OMOLO
………………………
E. O. O’KUBASU
…………………………
JUDGE OF APPEAL
W. S. DEVERELL
…………………………
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is atrue copy of the original
DEPUTY REGISTRAR