[2002] KECA 209 (KLR)
The Court determined that, since both parties agreed the appeal required at least two days for hearing, it was appropriate to remove the matter from the day's list and direct that it be set down for hearing for two clear days at the Registry. This ensures adequate time for a fair hearing and proper case management.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2002] KECA 209 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Peter Manson Ouko; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 78 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Order for Hearing Date Allocation
- Outcome
- Appeal adjourned; to be set down for hearing for two clear days.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Hearing, Case Management
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Manson Ouko
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Order for Hearing Date Allocation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal should proceed on the scheduled date or be adjourned for a longer hearing period.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court determined that, since both parties agreed the appeal required at least two days for hearing, it was appropriate to remove the matter from the day's list and direct that it be set down for hearing for two clear days at the Registry. This ensures adequate time for a fair hearing and proper case management.
Court Disposition
Appeal adjourned; to be set down for hearing for two clear days.
Orders
- The appeal is taken out of today's hearing list.
- The appeal is to be set down for hearing for two clear days at the Registry by the parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI
(CORAM: GICHERU, SHAH & KEIWUA JJ.A)
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.78 OF 2002
BETWEEN
PETER MANSON OUKO ......................................... APPELLANT
AND
REPUBLIC .............................................................. RESPONDENT
(Appeal from a conviction and sentence of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Mr. Justice Etyang) dated 24th May, 2001 in H.C.CR.C. NO.54 OF 1999) *****************
ORDER OF THE COURT
Both learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. Wagara and for the Republic Mr. Okumu are agreed that the hearing of this appeal requires at least two days.
Accordingly the appeal is taken out of today's hearing list for it to be set down for hearing for two clear days at the Registry by the parties.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 18th day of September, 2002.
J.E. GICHERU .................... JUDGE OF APPEAL
A.B. SHAH .................... JUDGE OF APPEAL
M. OLE KEIWUA ..................... JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR