[2019] KEHC 4646 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 4646 (KLR)

The court determined that the issues raised in this petition were similar to those already adjudicated in Bungoma Constitutional Petition No. 1 of 2019, in which judgment had been delivered. To avoid duplication and in the interest of judicial economy, the court marked the present file as closed, effectively...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 4646 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Peter Marango Mwibanda; Respondent: Governor County of Government Bungoma; Respondent: Clerk – Bungoma County Assembly; Respondent: Secretary – County Government of Bungoma; Respondent: CEC Members, Urban/Physical Planning & Housing
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Constitutional Petition 17 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling
Outcome
petition closed as issues already determined in previous judgment
Judges
SN Riechi
Legal Topics
Petition Closure, Res Judicata, Similar Issues, Judicial Economy
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Petition Closure Res Judicata Similar Issues Judicial Economy

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Marango Mwibanda

Applicant

Governor County of Government Bungoma

Respondent

Clerk – Bungoma County Assembly

Respondent

Secretary – County Government of Bungoma

Respondent

CEC Members, Urban/Physical Planning & Housing

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the issues in this petition are similar to those in Bungoma Constitutional Petition No. 1 of 2019.
  2. 2 Whether the petition should be closed due to duplication of issues.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that the issues raised in this petition were similar to those already adjudicated in Bungoma Constitutional Petition No. 1 of 2019, in which judgment had been delivered. To avoid duplication and in the interest of judicial economy, the court marked the present file as closed, effectively disposing of the matter without a substantive hearing on the merits.

Court Disposition

petition closed as issues already determined in previous judgment

Orders

  • This file is marked as closed.