[2018] KEHC 9946 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 9946 (KLR)

The court found that although the appeal had been dormant for several years, the applicant's failure to prosecute was partly due to the registry's delay in supplying the lower court record. The application for dismissal was heard in the applicant's absence, though he had been served. Now that the lower court record...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 9946 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Peter Mbua Gaitho; Respondent: Anna Munyiua; Respondent: Joseph Mutuku Mbithi (suing as the representatives of the estate of Job Mulinge Mbithi–Deceased)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 294 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal Order
Outcome
application allowed with conditions
Judges
BT Jaden
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Setting Aside Orders, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Setting Aside Orders Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Mbua Gaitho

Applicant

Anna Munyiua

Respondent

Joseph Mutuku Mbithi (suing as the representatives of the estate of Job Mulinge Mbithi–Deceased)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal Order

  1. 1 Whether the order dismissing the appeal for want of prosecution should be set aside.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's absence and delay were justified.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although the appeal had been dormant for several years, the applicant's failure to prosecute was partly due to the registry's delay in supplying the lower court record. The application for dismissal was heard in the applicant's absence, though he had been served. Now that the lower court record was available, the interests of justice required that the applicant be given an opportunity to prosecute the appeal. The court therefore exercised its discretion to set aside the dismissal order, subject to the applicant compiling and serving the record of appeal and fixing the appeal for directions within 90 days. Costs were awarded to the respondent.

Court Disposition

application allowed with conditions

Orders

  • The order made on 31st January, 2018 granting the Notice of Motion dated 29th June, 2017 is set aside.
  • The application is allowed on condition that the Record of Appeal be compiled and served and the appeal fixed for directions within 90 days from the date hereof.