[2017] KEELC 667 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 667 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had proved, on a balance of probabilities, that he is the registered proprietor of the suit land, having produced the original grant, deed plan, official search, allocation minutes, and receipts for rates. The defendants, having been duly served, failed to respond or appear, and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 667 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Peter Mochere Mabira; Defendant: Francis Kibet; Defendant: Carolyne Chevich alias Cheruto
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 100 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Land Case / Judgment After Formal Proof
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff; eviction and permanent injunction granted; mesne profits denied; costs and interest on costs awarded.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Title Registration, Eviction, Permanent Injunction, Trespass, Mesne Profits, Allocation of Land
Source Language
en
Land and Property Title Registration Eviction Permanent Injunction Trespass Mesne Profits Allocation of Land

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Mochere Mabira

Plaintiff

Francis Kibet

Defendant

Carolyne Chevich alias Cheruto

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land Case / Judgment After Formal Proof

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is the lawful registered proprietor of the suit land.
  2. 2 Whether the defendants unlawfully entered and occupied the suit land.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to eviction orders and a permanent injunction against the defendants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had proved, on a balance of probabilities, that he is the registered proprietor of the suit land, having produced the original grant, deed plan, official search, allocation minutes, and receipts for rates. The defendants, having been duly served, failed to respond or appear, and the evidence of their unlawful occupation and erection of illegal structures was uncontroverted. The court held that the plaintiff is entitled to eviction orders and a permanent injunction to protect his proprietary rights. However, the claim for mesne profits was denied as it was not specifically proved. The plaintiff was awarded costs and interest on costs.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff; eviction and permanent injunction granted; mesne profits denied; costs and interest on costs awarded.

Orders

  • Defendants, their agents, tenants or anyone claiming through them to be evicted from the suit land.
  • A permanent injunction restraining the defendants and others claiming under them from trespassing or interfering with the plaintiff’s quiet possession of the suit premises is granted.