[2015] KEHC 7678 (KLR)
The court determined that it cannot proceed to hear and determine the applicant's appeal in the absence of the trial court proceedings. The applicant has failed to provide clear and accurate information regarding the specific court and case number of his conviction, and the file referenced by the applicant does not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 7678 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Muthui Mwenga; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application 222 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Ruling on Availability of Trial Court Proceedings for Appeal
- Outcome
- Interlocutory orders issued; no final determination on the appeal.
- Judges
- LK Kimaru, AW Macharia
- Legal Topics
- Robbery With Violence, Appeal Record Availability, Retrial Conditions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Muthui Mwenga
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Ruling on Availability of Trial Court Proceedings for Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proceedings of the subordinate court are available to facilitate the hearing and determination of the applicant's appeal.
- 2 Whether the applicant has provided accurate information regarding the trial court and case number.
- 3 What orders should be made if the trial court proceedings are missing or cannot be confirmed.
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that it cannot proceed to hear and determine the applicant's appeal in the absence of the trial court proceedings. The applicant has failed to provide clear and accurate information regarding the specific court and case number of his conviction, and the file referenced by the applicant does not correspond to his case. The court held that before any orders can be made regarding the appeal, it must be confirmed with the Chief Magistrate’s Courts at Kibera and Thika whether the applicant was tried before them and whether the proceedings are available. If the proceedings are confirmed to be missing, the only lawful order would be for a retrial. The court emphasized that...
Court Disposition
Interlocutory orders issued; no final determination on the appeal.
Orders
- The Deputy Registrar is ordered to write to the Chief Magistrates of Kibera and Thika Law Courts to ascertain the status of the proceedings of the applicant’s trial court case.
- The criminal registers of the respective courts are to be checked to confirm the information given by the applicant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL DIVISION
MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.222 OF 2015
PETER MUTHUI MWENGA………APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC……………………….RESPONDENT
RULING
The Applicant, Peter Muthui Mwenga was convicted of the offence of robbery with violence contrary to Section 296(2) of the Penal Code. The Applicant was convicted on 18th December 2009. The proceedings of the subordinate court have not been availed to this court for the purpose of the hearing and determination of the appeal. The Applicant claimed that the case was heard before the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Kibera. He gave the Number of the file as Criminal Case No.3092 of 2000. The Deputy Registrar of this court wrote to the said court to avail the file for the purposes of the appeal. The records of the said court indicate that the accused in Criminal Case No.3092 of 2000 were Simon Moiti Tiwa and King’ombe Hussein Fred. Both had been charged with burglary contrary toSection 304(2) of the Penal Code. They were convicted and sentenced to serve a term of probation on 24th August 2000. This court was not availed the particular file because it was destroyed pursuant to The Records Disposal (Courts) Rules. The Notice of destruction of the said files was given vide Gazette Notice No.6301 of 11th August 2006. This court cannot therefore confirm whether the file the Applicant claims was the one he was tried in is the particular file or not.
On further perusal of the petition of appeal filed by the Applicant, it is apparent that the Applicant alleges that his criminal case was heard before the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Thika. The Criminal Case No.3092 of 2000 could therefore have been filed before the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Thika. The court notes that the judgment that is intended to be challenged on appeal to this court is the decision of the then Chief Magistrate Mrs. U.P. Kidula. Incidentally, she served in both stations i.e. Thika and Kibera. The Applicant claims that the hearing of his appeal has been frustrated because he has been unable to access the proceedings of the trial court for the purposes of this appeal. It is clear to this court that the Applicant is not being candid in regard to the specific court case number relating to his trial before the subordinate court. Before this court can make any orders in regard to the Applicant’s application, it must confirm with the Thika Chief Magistrate’s Court whether the Applicant was tried before the said court. The Applicant is urged to be truthful and indicate to the court the specific file relating to his appeal. For the avoidance of any doubt, this court will not make any decision in respect of the appeal until the proceedings of the trial court are either availed or established to be completely missing. And if the latter is the case, the only order that this court can legally make in such circumstances is for the Applicant to be retried. So, if the Applicant thinks that he can conceal the number of the criminal case that he faced before the trial court, he is not helping his case at all.
In the premises therefore, the Deputy Registrar of this court is ordered to write to the Chief Magistrates of Kibera and Thika Law Courts with a view to ascertaining once and for all the status of the proceedings of the trial court of the Applicant’s case. In that regard, the criminal Registers of the respective courts should be checked to confirm the information given by the Applicant. This matter shall be mentioned after thirty (30) days of today’s Ruling to confirm compliance with the orders of this court. It is so ordered.
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015
L. KIMARU
JUDGE
G.W. NGENYE – MACHARIA
JUDGE