https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/8994
The applicant had spent 1 year, 3 months and 6 days in remand custody before sentencing, and the trial court failed to credit that period as required by section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The High Court therefore corrected the sentence by deducting the remand period from the 20-year term.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 8994 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Mwangi Wanjohi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E022 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Sentence Review/credit for Time Spent in Custody
- Outcome
- Application allowed; sentence corrected.
- Judges
- ["JK Sergon"]
- Legal Topics
- Defilement, Sentence Computation, Credit for Pre Trial Custody, Section 333(2) Criminal Procedure Code
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Mwangi Wanjohi
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Sentence Review/credit for Time Spent in Custody
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was entitled to have the period spent in remand custody deducted from the sentence.
- 2 Whether the trial court erred by failing to factor in the pre-trial custody period under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant had spent 1 year, 3 months and 6 days in remand custody before sentencing, and the trial court failed to credit that period as required by section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The High Court therefore corrected the sentence by deducting the remand period from the 20-year term.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; sentence corrected.
Orders
- The period spent in remand custody, being 1 year, 3 months and 6 days, shall be deducted from the 20-year sentence.
- The applicant shall serve 18 years, 8 months and 24 days from 22 June 2018.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Wanjohi v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E022 of 2022) [2026] KEHC 8994 (KLR) (24 June 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 8994 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the High Court at Nakuru Miscellaneous Criminal Application E022 of 2022 JK Sergon, J June 24, 2026 Between Peter Mwangi Wanjohi Applicant and Republic Respondent Ruling 1.Peter Mwangi Wanjohi the applicant herein was tried before the Chief Magistrate’s Court on a charge of defilement contrary to section 8(1) and (2) of the Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006. At the end of the trial, the applicant was convicted and sentenced to serve 20 years imprisonment. 2.The applicant has now taken out the undated application whereof he applied for the period spent in remand custody to be factored in the sentence. When the application came up for hearing, Miss Mwaura who appeared on behalf of the Director of Public Prosecution, did not oppose the application and left it to this court to determine the same on the basis of the material placed before it. 3.This court has taken into account the grounds stated on the application and the facts deponed in the supporting affidavit. I have further perused the record of the trial court. It is apparent from the trial court’s record that the applicant spent 1 year 3 months 6 days in remand custody at the time of sentencing. 4.It is also apparent that the learned trial Chief Magistrate proceeded to sentence the applicant to serve 20 years imprisonment without factoring the period served in remand custody. In other words, the learned Chief Magistrate failed to give credit to the applicant for the period spent in lawful pre-trial custody. 5.The proviso to section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure code expressly states:“Provided that where the person sentenced under sub-section (1) has, prior to such sentence, been held in custody, the sentence shall take account of the period spent in custody”. 6.This court is bound to take steps even at this stage to ensure that credit is given to the applicant for the period spent in remand custody while undergoing trial on the sentence. 7.Consequently, the period served in custody pending trial ie one year three months and 6 days should be deducted from the 20 years’ imprisonment. 8.Consequently, the applicant namely Peter Mwangi Wanjohi should instead serve 18 years 8 months and 24 days from 22nd June, 2018. In other words, the prison authorities should deduct 1 year, 3 months and 6 days from the twenty (20) years sentence meted out against the applicant. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 AT NAKURU.J. K. SERGONJUDGEIn presence of:Jamleck/Rutoh C/AAnyumba for ApplicantApplicant present in person