[2022] KEELC 581 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 581 (KLR)

The court found that the dispute between the parties concerns ownership and title to the suit property, which are substantive issues that ought to be determined on merit after hearing all parties. The court exercised its discretion to grant leave to the applicant to file an appeal out of time, finding that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 581 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Peter Ndambiri Njagi; Respondent: Quasim Hirsi Karah; Respondent: Farah Hassan Abdullahi; Respondent: Amina Abdullahi; Respondent: Mohamed Abubakar Mohamed
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 2 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution
Outcome
application allowed in part
Judges
LC Komingoi
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Stay of Execution, Ownership Disputes, Title to Land
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Leave to Appeal Out of Time Stay of Execution Ownership Disputes Title to Land

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Ndambiri Njagi

Applicant

Quasim Hirsi Karah

Respondent

Farah Hassan Abdullahi

Respondent

Amina Abdullahi

Respondent

Mohamed Abubakar Mohamed

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time against the decision declining to set aside ex parte orders.
  2. 2 Whether an order of stay of execution of the orders made on 27th August 2020 should be granted pending the intended appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the memorandum of appeal filed should be deemed as duly filed upon grant of leave.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the dispute between the parties concerns ownership and title to the suit property, which are substantive issues that ought to be determined on merit after hearing all parties. The court exercised its discretion to grant leave to the applicant to file an appeal out of time, finding that the interests of justice would be best served by allowing the appeal to proceed. The court also granted a stay of execution of the orders made on 27th August 2020, pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal, to preserve the subject matter. The grant of these orders was made conditional upon the applicant paying throw away costs to the 1st and 2nd respondents within...

Court Disposition

application allowed in part

Orders

  • Leave granted to the applicant to file and/or lodge an appeal out of time against the decision delivered on 30th March 2021.
  • Order of stay of execution of the orders made on 27th August 2020 granted pending hearing and determination of the intended appeal.