[2020] KEHC 382 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 382 (KLR)

The court found that the application for stay of execution was made promptly, within a month of the judgment. While the applicant did not demonstrate substantial loss beyond the risk of the appeal being rendered nugatory, the respondent did not oppose the provision of security and proposed that the decretal sum be...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 382 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Peter Nduva; Respondent: Abdulkadir Osman (Suing as legal representative of the Estate of Hussein Abdulkadir, deceased)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 166 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay Application Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed; stay of execution granted upon condition.
Judges
BC Koech
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Security for Performance, Appeals Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Security for Performance Appeals Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Nduva

Applicant

Abdulkadir Osman (Suing as legal representative of the Estate of Hussein Abdulkadir, deceased)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay Application Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has presented sufficient reasons to justify a grant of an order of stay of execution pending determination of the appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the application was brought without undue delay.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant will suffer substantial loss if the stay is not granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for stay of execution was made promptly, within a month of the judgment. While the applicant did not demonstrate substantial loss beyond the risk of the appeal being rendered nugatory, the respondent did not oppose the provision of security and proposed that the decretal sum be deposited in a joint account. The applicant confirmed willingness to deposit the entire decretal amount as security. On a balance of probabilities, the court held that the applicant met the requirements for a stay of execution pending appeal, and that depositing the decretal sum in a joint interest-earning account would adequately safeguard the interests of both parties.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; stay of execution granted upon condition.

Orders

  • An order of stay of execution of the judgment in Mavoko Cmcc No. 1305 of 2015 is granted upon the appellant depositing the entire decretal amount into a joint interest earning account in the names of the advocates of the parties within thirty (30) days from the date of this ruling, failing which the stay shall lapse.
  • The costs of the application shall abide in the appeal.