[2018] KEHC 2759 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's appeal is arguable, particularly on the issue of whether he reasonably believed the complainant was over 18 years of age, as raised under Section 8(5) of the Sexual Offences Act. The court noted that the applicant had been on bail during trial and attended court faithfully, and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 2759 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Peter Njeru Gatari; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 6 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- FN Muchemi
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Defilement, Reasonable Belief of Age, Sexual Offences Act, Sentencing, Appeal Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Njeru Gatari
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to bail pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated that the appeal has overwhelming chances of success.
- 3 Whether the applicant reasonably believed the complainant was over 18 years of age.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's appeal is arguable, particularly on the issue of whether he reasonably believed the complainant was over 18 years of age, as raised under Section 8(5) of the Sexual Offences Act. The court noted that the applicant had been on bail during trial and attended court faithfully, and that the respondent's opposition was not vehement. In the circumstances, the court exercised its discretion to grant bail pending appeal, finding that the applicant should be given a chance to pursue his appeal without being in confinement.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The applicant/appellant may be released on bond of Kshs.300,000 with one surety.
- The applicant will attend bi-monthly mentions pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 6 OF 2018
PETER NJERU GATARI..................APPLICANT/APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC..............................................................RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
1. This is an application for bail pending appeal dated 10/03/2018. It is based on the grounds that the applicant was on bail during the pendency of the trial and that he attended court faithfully. It is also deponed that his appeal has overwhelming chances of success.
2. Further that he shall abide by all the conditions set by this court on release.
3. In the replying affidavit of the prosecution counsel Leah Mati, this application is opposed on grounds that the applicant has not demonstrated that his appeal has any chances of success. That no justifiable reasons have been given to justify granting the orders for bail.
4. Mr. Momanyi for the applicant filed submissions arguing that although bail is not a constitutional right at this stage, the prosecution has not demonstrated any compelling reasons why the appellant should not be released. He is yet to exhaust all the avenues of his constitutional right regarding criminal justice.
5. The counsel pointed out at some parts of the witnesses’ evidence and submitted that the complainant had gone to the home of the accused voluntarily. He cited a Malindi HCCR No. 32 of 2015 in which the judge dealt with facts similar to those of this appeal.
6. The gist of the argument is that the victim portrayed herself as an adult and should be taken to be so.
7. The applicant further submitted that the child told him she was 18 years although her age in court was said to be 16 years. He reasonably believed that the complainant had told him the truth.
8. Based on the summary of the facts or evidence sampled, the applicant is of the opinion that his case has high chance of success.
9. From the record, the applicant was charged and convicted by Siakago Resident Magistrate of the offence of defilement contrary to Section 8(4) of the Sexual Offences Act. He was sentenced to serve 15 years’ imprisonment.
10. I have perused the affidavit and the submissions of the respondent and do not find it vehemently in opposition of this application. I have also perused the judgment and noted that the applicant had raised the defence under Section 8(5) of the Act that he reasonably believed that the complainant was over 18 years.
11. It is my considered view that the appeal is arguable and ought to be given a chance to be heard with the applicant not in confinement.
12. I therefore find this application merited and allow it in the following terms:
a) That the applicant/appellant may be released on bond of Kshs.300,000/= with one surety.
b) That he will attend bi-monthly mentions pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
13. It is hereby so ordered.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT EMBU THIS 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2018.
F. MUCHEMI
JUDGE
In the presence of: -
Ms. Muriuki for Momanyi for Applicant