[2018] KEHC 1861 (KLR)
The court found that the plea of guilty entered by the applicant was not unequivocal due to the factual confusion regarding the number of satchets of alcoholic drinks involved. The prosecution's later attempt to clarify the evidence could not cure the initial defect in the plea. The conviction and sentence, which...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 1861 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Peter Okelo; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision 157 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Sentence Revision
- Outcome
- conviction and sentence set aside; applicant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Plea of Guilty, Sentence Revision, Conviction Safety, Evidence Discrepancy
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Okelo
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Sentence Revision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plea of guilty entered by the applicant was unequivocal and valid.
- 2 Whether the conviction and sentence based on the number of satchets was safe and warranted.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plea of guilty entered by the applicant was not unequivocal due to the factual confusion regarding the number of satchets of alcoholic drinks involved. The prosecution's later attempt to clarify the evidence could not cure the initial defect in the plea. The conviction and sentence, which were based on an incorrect factual basis, were therefore unsafe and unwarranted. As a result, the court set aside and vacated both the conviction and sentence, ordering the immediate release of the applicant unless otherwise lawfully held.
Court Disposition
conviction and sentence set aside; applicant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held
Orders
- The conviction and sentence of Peter Okelo are set aside and vacated.
- The convict Peter Okelo is ordered to be set free unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA
HC. REV. NO. 157 OF 2018
(CORAM: R. E. ABURILI - J.)
PETER OKELO.....................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC..........................................RESPONDENT
(Being an Appeal seeking Sentence Revision against judgment delivered in Criminal Case No. 960 of 2018 at Siaya Law Courts, PM’s Court.)
RULING ON REVISION OF SENTENCE
1. On 1st October 2018, this court ordered for an affidavit to be sworn and filed by the Investigating Officer to clarify on the issue of the number of satchets of alcoholic drinks with which the applicant Peter Okello was charged and convicted on his own plea of guilty on an undisclosed date.
2. However, on 26/9/2018 the Prosecutor applied saying he had inadvertedly produced 57 satchets which were meant for accused in File No. 962/2018 instead of 2 satchets and the court, Hon. Ongondo in Siaya PM Cr. Case No. 960 of 2018 ordered that:
“in that case the file is hereby forwarded to the Deputy Registrar to be placed before the Hon. Judge urgently for revision.”
3. It was on the basis of the above that on 1/10/2018, I ordered for an affidavit of the Investigating Officer to clarify the issue but it would appear the order was never served upon the Investigating Officer and the same has been returned to me unattended, while the applicant is languishing in prison on an unclear Plea of Guilty.
4. I have considered the plea taken on undated day and the subsequent order of 26/9/2018 and I am persuaded that the plea was not unequivocal on the face of it as the prosecution tended to cure the defect later.
5. The facts upon which the applicant was convicted are possession and selling of 152 satchets of alcoholic drinks yet the subsequent application by the Prosecutor shows that the satchets were only 2 and not 152.
6. Accordingly, I find the conviction and sentence of a fine of Kshs. 30,000/= in default 6 months was unwarranted and unsafe.
7. The conviction and sentence are hereby set aside and vacated. The convict Peter Okello is hereby ordered to be set free unless otherwise lawfully held.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at SIAYA this 21st Day of November 2018.
R.E. ABURILI
JUDGE