[2012] KEHC 190 (KLR)
The court found that committal to civil jail for non-payment of a civil debt is inconsistent with Article 11 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which prohibits imprisonment merely on the ground of inability to fulfill a contractual obligation. This international norm is incorporated into...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] KEHC 190 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Peter Okwako Murwa; Respondent: Sylvanus Emmanuel Walutsachi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 63 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application allowed with conditions
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Civil Jail, Decretal Sum, Security for Costs, Sale of Land
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Okwako Murwa
Appellant
Sylvanus Emmanuel Walutsachi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the decree pending appeal.
- 2 Whether committal to civil jail for non-payment of a civil debt is lawful under Kenyan law and international conventions.
- 3 Whether the applicant should provide security for the stay of execution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that committal to civil jail for non-payment of a civil debt is inconsistent with Article 11 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which prohibits imprisonment merely on the ground of inability to fulfill a contractual obligation. This international norm is incorporated into Kenyan law by Article 2(6) of the Constitution. The court further held that the applicant is entitled to seek a stay of execution to avoid deprivation of liberty and to enable him to find ways to satisfy the debt. However, the stay is conditional upon the applicant depositing security of Kshs.100,000 to safeguard the respondent's interests. The application for stay is therefore...
Court Disposition
application allowed with conditions
Orders
- Stay of execution of the decree granted pending appeal, on condition that the applicant deposits security of Kshs.100,000.
- Costs of the application awarded to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
High Court at Kakamega
Civil Appeal 63 of 2012 [if gte mso 9]><xml>
Normal 0
false false false
EN-GB X-NONE X-NONE
</xml><![endif][if gte mso 9]><![endif][if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; line-height:115%; font-size:11. 0pt;"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-bidi-"Times New Roman";} </style> <![endif]
PETER OKWAKO MURWA ....................................APPELLANT/APPLICANT
A N D
SYLVANUS EMMANUEL WALUTSACHI ................................. RESPONDENT
(AN APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION OF DECREE PENDING APPEAL)
R U L I N G
The application dated 9. 7.12 seeks orders for stay of execution of the decree herein pending the hearing of the appeal.
The application is supported by the affidavit of PETER OKWAKO MURWA the appellant/applicant sworn on 9. 7.2012.
The applicant’s case as per the evidence of the supporting affidavit is that the respondent sued him for a balance of the purchase price for the sale of a parcel of land. The balance is reflected by the applicant as Kshs.58,000/=. The applicant contends that before the bill of costs was assessed, the applicant was arrested and committed to civil jail. The applicant has further averred that he suffers from a chronic heart condition and high blood pressure.
In opposition to the application, the respondent, SYLVANUS EMMANUEL WALUTSACHI filed a replying affidavit sworn on 17. 7.12. In the said affidavit, it is contended that the applicant has come to court with unclean hands since he has failed to pay the decretal sum. It is further stated that the applicant was committed to civil jail after due process. The respondent has also stated that there is no evidence that the applicant suffers from any chronic decease.
It is clear from both affidavits that the applicant has not paid the entire decretal sum. The application for execution exhibited by the respondent reflects the outstanding amount as Kshs.71,751. 40cts. The decree and the Certificate of costs were duly issued (annexture SEW”4”).
However, committal to civil jail violates the provisions of Article 11 of the international convention on civil and political rights which was ratified by Kenya forms part of the Kenyan law. Article 2 (6) of the Constitution of Kenya stipulates as follows:-
“Any treaty or convention ratified by Kenya shall form part of the law of Kenya under this Constitution.”
The applicant is therefore entitled to seek ways of bettering himself. If the applicant is committed to civil jail, his freedom even to seek ways of repaying the debt will be curtailed.
In arriving to this conclusion, I am persuaded by the reasoning of M. K. Koome, J (as she then was) in the following authority:-
IN THE MATER OF BANKRUPTCY ACT CH.53 LK
RE ZIPPORAH MATHARA (2010) eKLR.
The application is allowed on the condition that the applicant do deposit security of Kshs.100,000/=. Costs of the application to the respondent.
Delivered, dated and signed at Kakamega this 22nd day of November, 2012
B. THURANIRA JADEN
J U D G E