[2020] KEHC 7030 (KLR)
The court found that the mandatory death sentence imposed on the petitioner was unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu. The court considered the petitioner's mitigation, including his status as a first offender, his health condition (HIV/AIDS), and the fact that he had already served...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 7030 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: Peter Ooko Otieno; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecution
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition 53 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition allowed; sentence reviewed; petitioner released unless otherwise lawfully held
- Judges
- DO Ogembo
- Legal Topics
- Mandatory Death Sentence, Sentence Review, Right to Fair Trial, Mitigation, Unconstitutionality of Statutes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Ooko Otieno
Petitioner
Director of Public Prosecution
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court decision in Muruatetu.
- 2 Whether the petitioner is entitled to a review of sentence and immediate release based on time served, mitigation, and health status.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the mandatory death sentence imposed on the petitioner was unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu. The court considered the petitioner's mitigation, including his status as a first offender, his health condition (HIV/AIDS), and the fact that he had already served 12 years in custody. The court determined that these factors warranted setting aside the death sentence and substituting it with a custodial sentence equivalent to the period already served. Consequently, the petitioner was ordered to be released unless otherwise lawfully held.
Court Disposition
petition allowed; sentence reviewed; petitioner released unless otherwise lawfully held
Orders
- The death sentence is set aside.
- The petitioner is sentenced to the term already served.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA
PETITION NO. 53 OF 2018
PETER OOKO OTIENO .............................................PETITIONER
AND
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION.............RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. The Petitioner was convicted for the offence of Robbery with Violence contrary to Section 296(2) of the Penal Code and sentenced to death in Kwale Cr. Case No. 240 of 2008. He appealed in HCCRA No. 34 of 2010 and Criminal Appeal. No. 26 of 2013. Both appeals were dismissed and sentence upheld.
2. The Petitioner has now petitioned this court for review of sentence in view of the Supreme Court declaration in Francis Kariokor Muruatetu & Another vs. Republic SCK Pet. No. 15 of 2015 (2017) eKLRin which the apex court found the mandatory nature of the death sentence to be unconstitutional.
Brief Circumstance of the offence
3. The particulars are that on 16th February 2008 at 11. 30 p.m. the Petitioner together with others robbed Esther Wangui Wairimu of her Samsung mobile phone valued at Ksh. 20,000 but was acquitted on a second count in which it was alleged that he robbed one Anne Njeri.
4. The Petitioner submitted that the death sentence, which was commuted to life imprisonment is unconstitutional. He has now exhausted his right of appeal and approaches this Court to declare the death sentence unconstitutional and contrary to Article 50(1) and Article 25(a) of the constitution, and to impose an appropriate sentence upon him.
5. He further submitted that the court did not consider his mitigation as he is a first offender. He has now spent 10 years in custody. The Petitioner apologized for the offence he committed and submitted that he has reformed having learnt a lot in custody, that he is unwell as he suffers from HIV/ AIDS, and that he should be released to go home and access good treatment.
6. Mr. Fedha, Learned Counsel for the prosecution submitted that the Petitioner was armed at the time of the offence, and that even though no one was injured, his accomplices at the time of the offence are still at large. Counsel further submitted that the Petitioner has been in custody for 12 years and prayed that he be jailed for 15 years including time served.
7. I have considered the Petition as well submissions of the parties. I have also considered the appearance and demeanor of the Petitioner in Court and have taken into account his sickness of HIV. I have also considered that the Petitioner has served 12 years in custody. Upon these premises, I herewith set aside the death sentence herein and in the place thereof I jail the Petitioner to the term equivalent with that already served, and hereby set the Petitioner free unless lawfully held.
That is the Judgment of the court.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Mombasa this 9th day April, of 2020.
E. K. O. OGOLA
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Petitioner in person via video link
Ms. Mwangeka for DPP
Mr. Kaunda Court Assistant