[2019] KEHC 766 (KLR)
The court held that, pursuant to Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the appellant's sentence for manslaughter must take into account the period he spent in remand custody prior to sentencing. The record established that the appellant was arrested on 20.1.2017 and remained in custody until his conviction...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 766 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Peter Owuor Adoko; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 67 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction withdrawn; appeal against sentence allowed; sentence to run from date of arrest.
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Sentencing Principles, Credit for Time Served
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Owuor Adoko
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's sentence should be computed from the date of arrest, taking into account the period spent in remand custody.
- 2 Whether the appeal against conviction should be marked as withdrawn upon the appellant's oral application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, pursuant to Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the appellant's sentence for manslaughter must take into account the period he spent in remand custody prior to sentencing. The record established that the appellant was arrested on 20.1.2017 and remained in custody until his conviction and sentencing on 14.8.2019, as there was no evidence he was ever released on bond. The court found no evidence of escape from lawful custody, rendering Section 38 of the Penal Code inapplicable. Consequently, the court allowed the appeal against sentence, set aside the original sentence, and substituted it with a prison term of 10 years to be calculated from the date of...
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction withdrawn; appeal against sentence allowed; sentence to run from date of arrest.
Orders
- The appeal against conviction is marked as withdrawn on the appellant's oral application.
- The appeal against sentence is allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 67 OF 2019
PETER OWUOR ADOKO.............APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC...................................PROSECUTOR
((Being an Appeal against conviction and sentence from original Bondo
PM CR Case No. 1033 of 2019 dated 14. 8.2019before Hon. E.N. Wasike – S.R.M.)
JUDGMENT
1. The appellant Peter Owuor Adoko was convicted and sentenced to serve 10 years imprisonment vide Bondo Principal Magistrate’s Court, Criminal Case No. 1033/2019, for the offence of Manslaughter contrary to Section 202 as read with Section 205 of the Penal Code. This was after a full trial. The impugned decision subject of this appeal was delivered on 14. 8.2019.
2. He lodged this appeal dated 23. 8.2019 before this court on an unnamed date. However, it is the fault of the registry not to receive the appeal with the date stamp and not the mistake of the appellant.
3. The appellant now informs the court that he is satisfied with the conviction only that his sentence be considered to be from the date of his arrest. The trial initially commenced in the High Court where the appellant had been charged with the offence of murder which was reduced to Manslaughter and the case remitted to the Magistrate’s Court for trial.
4. I have considered the appeal by the appellant and the application for withdrawal of the appeal against conviction and reconsideration of the sentence.
5. I am satisfied that the appellant is entitled to the Orders prayed orally before the Court. The appeal against conviction is hereby marked as withdrawn on the appellant’s own oral application.
6. As against sentence, I have perused the trial Court record and I established that the appellant was, as per the charge sheet signed by OCS Bondo Police Station on 1. 11. 2018, arrested on 20. 1.2017. That being the case, the appellant had been in remand up to 14. 8.2019 when he was sentenced to serve 10 years imprisonment, been in remand for a period of 2 years and 3 months, as he was not on bond, although he was granted bond of KShs.300,000 plus one surety of similar amount but the record does not show that he was ever released or that his sureties were approved.
7. Under Section 333 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, a warrant under the hand of a Judge or Magistrate by which a person is sentenced to imprisonment, ordering that the sentence shall be carried out in any prison within Kenya, shall be issued by the sentencing Judge or Magistrate and shall be full authority to the officer in charge of the Prison and to all other person for carrying into effect the sentence described in the warrant, not being a sentence of death. Under section 333 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, Subject to the Provision of Section 38 of the Penal Code, every sentence shall be deemed to commence from and to include the whole of the day of, the date on which it was pronounced, except where otherwise provided in this Code, provided that where the person sentenced under Sub-Section (1) has prior to such sentence, been held in custody, the sentence shall take account of the period spent in custody.
8. Section 38 of the Penal Code is on escaped convict and it provides that when sentence is passed under this Code on an escaped convict, that sentence:
(a) If of death, or fine, shall subject to the provisions of this Code, take effect immediately;
(b) If of imprisonment, shall run consecutively or concurrently, as the Court shall Order, with the unexpired portion of the sentence which the convict was undergoing when he escaped.
9. In this case, there is no evidence that the appellant had escaped from lawful custody.
10. Accordingly, I find and hold that following his conviction for manslaughter, his sentence ought to have run from the date of his arrest and the time spent in custody as contemplated in Section 333(2) the proviso thereof to the Criminal Procedure Code.
11. For that reason, the appeal against conviction having been withdrawn by the appellant, I hereby allow this appeal against sentence and set aside the sentence imposed on the appellant and substitute it with a prison term of 10 years to be calculated from 20. 1.2017.
12. Orders accordingly.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Siaya this 20th Day of November, 2019.
R.E. ABURILI
JUDGE