[2022] KEHC 12064 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 12064 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's request to recall PW1 for further cross-examination was justified under section 250 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The judge was persuaded that the respondent would not suffer any prejudice if the witness was recalled. In the interest of justice, the court allowed the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 12064 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Gathungu Gikonyo Peter; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E092 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application to Recall Witness for Further Cross Examination
Outcome
Application allowed in part; PW1 to be recalled for further cross-examination; prosecution's case re-opened to that extent; trial court file to be returned for hearing and determination; no order as to costs.
Judges
DO Ogembo
Legal Topics
Recall of Witness, Cross Examination, Criminal Trial Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Recall of Witness Cross Examination Criminal Trial Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gathungu Gikonyo Peter

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application to Recall Witness for Further Cross Examination

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to have PW1 recalled for further cross-examination before the court makes its finding under section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
  2. 2 Whether recalling the witness would prejudice the respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's request to recall PW1 for further cross-examination was justified under section 250 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The judge was persuaded that the respondent would not suffer any prejudice if the witness was recalled. In the interest of justice, the court allowed the application to the extent that PW1 be recalled for further cross-examination by the defence, and ordered the prosecution's case to be re-opened for that purpose. The trial court file was to be returned to the trial court for hearing and determination. No order as to costs was made.

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; PW1 to be recalled for further cross-examination; prosecution's case re-opened to that extent; trial court file to be returned for hearing and determination; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The application dated 17.5.2022 is allowed only to the extent that PW1 be recalled for further cross-examination by the defence.
  • The prosecution's case is ordered to be re-opened to that extent.