[2019] KEELC 2457 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 2457 (KLR)

The court held that since the Plaintiffs' suit was dismissed under Order 12 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules and there was no counterclaim by the Defendant/Applicant, nor any application to revive the dismissed suit, there was no legal substratum for the Defendant/Applicant's application. The absence of a pending...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 2457 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Peter Waweru Njiru; Plaintiff: David Mugo Njiru; Plaintiff: Stephen Muchiri Njiru; Defendant: Evans Njiru Ngangi
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kerugoya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 183 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Chamber Summons / Ruling on Post Dismissal Application
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Removal of Encumbrances, Land Title Registration, Post Dismissal Applications
Source Language
en
Land and Property Removal of Encumbrances Land Title Registration Post Dismissal Applications

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Waweru Njiru

Plaintiff

David Mugo Njiru

Plaintiff

Stephen Muchiri Njiru

Plaintiff

Evans Njiru Ngangi

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Chamber Summons / Ruling on Post Dismissal Application

  1. 1 Whether the court can grant an order for removal of encumbrances on land parcel GICHUGU/SETTLEMENT SCHEME/5296 after the main suit was dismissed.
  2. 2 Whether the application is competent in the absence of a subsisting suit or counterclaim.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since the Plaintiffs' suit was dismissed under Order 12 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules and there was no counterclaim by the Defendant/Applicant, nor any application to revive the dismissed suit, there was no legal substratum for the Defendant/Applicant's application. The absence of a pending suit or counterclaim meant the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the application for removal of encumbrances. The application was therefore incompetent and constituted an abuse of the court process, warranting its dismissal with costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The Chamber summons dated 7th February 2019 is dismissed with costs.