[2021] KEELC 114 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 114 (KLR)

The court found that the application raised issues of sufficient urgency to warrant certification and the granting of interim relief as prayed in prayers 2 and 4. However, the court determined that the substantive issues could only be resolved after all parties have been heard. Accordingly, the court certified the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 114 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Peterson Maina Gakuya; Defendant: Mary Wairimu; Defendant: Director of Land Adjudication; Defendant: District Land Registrar Mbeere North; Defendant: Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Embu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 023 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Application Ruling
Outcome
interim orders granted; application certified urgent; matter set for inter partes hearing
Legal Topics
Land Adjudication, Urgent Applications, Interlocutory Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Land Adjudication Urgent Applications Interlocutory Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peterson Maina Gakuya

Plaintiff

Mary Wairimu

Defendant

Director of Land Adjudication

Defendant

District Land Registrar Mbeere North

Defendant

Attorney General

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Application Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the application raises issues that require urgent consideration.
  2. 2 Whether prayers 2 and 4 of the application should be granted at this stage.
  3. 3 Whether the matter should proceed to inter partes hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application raised issues of sufficient urgency to warrant certification and the granting of interim relief as prayed in prayers 2 and 4. However, the court determined that the substantive issues could only be resolved after all parties have been heard. Accordingly, the court certified the application as urgent, granted the specified interim orders, directed service of the application upon the defendants within 10 days, and set a date for parties to appear for directions. Costs were ordered to be in the cause.

Court Disposition

interim orders granted; application certified urgent; matter set for inter partes hearing

Orders

  • The application is certified urgent.
  • Prayers 2 and 4 of the application are granted.