[2018] KEHC 1754 (KLR)
The court found that the dispute arose from an employer-employee relationship and concerned alleged breaches of statutory duty and workplace safety, matters which fall squarely within the jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court as established by Article 162(2) of the Constitution and the Employment...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 1754 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Petronila Tsisika Anyanda (suing as the administrator of the estate of Philip Luvale Mwanje); Respondent: Butali Sugar Co. Ltd alias Butali Sugar Co. Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 3 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Appeal transferred for want of jurisdiction.
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Courts, Employment Relationship, Workplace Safety, Statutory Duty of Employer
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Petronila Tsisika Anyanda (suing as the administrator of the estate of Philip Luvale Mwanje)
Appellant
Butali Sugar Co. Ltd alias Butali Sugar Co. Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear an appeal arising from an employer-employee dispute relating to workplace safety and statutory duty.
- 2 Whether the dispute falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court as established under Article 162(2) of the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the dispute arose from an employer-employee relationship and concerned alleged breaches of statutory duty and workplace safety, matters which fall squarely within the jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court as established by Article 162(2) of the Constitution and the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act. Consequently, the High Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the appeal, and the proper forum for determination is the Employment and Labour Relations Court.
Court Disposition
Appeal transferred for want of jurisdiction.
Orders
- The matter is transferred to the Employment and Labour Relations Court sitting at Kisumu for further directions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3 OF 2015
PETRONILA TSISIKA ANYANDA(suing as the administrator
of the estate of PHILIP LUVALE MWANJE....................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
BUTALI SUGAR CO. LTDalias BUTALI SUGAR CO. LTD.....RESPONDENT
(An appeal arising from the ruling and order of the Hon. P Achieng, Acting Principal Magistrate (Ag PM), in Kakamega CMCCC No. 400 of 2012 of 28th November 2014)
RULING
1. The Constitution 2010, at Article 162(2), establishes a special court to handle disputes that revolve around industrial and labour relations. Article 165(5) of the same Constitution strips the High Court of jurisdiction over such matters.
2. For avoidance of doubt, Article 162(2) states as follows:–
‘Parliament shall establish courts with the status of the High Court to hear and determine disputes relating to –
(a) employment and labour relations; and
(b) the environment and the use and occupation of, and title to, land.’
3. On the other hand, Article 165(5) of the Constitution states as follows:-
‘The High Court shall not have jurisdiction in respect of matters-
(a) reserved for the exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under this Constitution; or
(b) falling within the jurisdiction of the courts contemplated in Article 162(2).’
4. In obedience to Article 162(2) of the Constitution, Parliament did, through the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, No. 20 of 2011, establish such a court, known as the Employment and Labour Relations Court. The jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court is set out in section 17 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act. The said court has exclusive original and appellate jurisdiction to hear and determine all disputes referred to it in accordance with Article 162(2) of the Constitution, relating to employment and labour relations, which includes disputes relating to or arising out of employment between an employer and an employee.
5. The pleadings lodged at the lower court disclose that the parties hereto were in an employer and employee relationship at the time material of the dispute at hand. The cause of action is said to have arisen in the course of the said employment. It is alleged in the plaint that the incident the subject of the suit arose on account of failure to provide a safe working environment, and breach of statutory duty. The suit therefore turns on matters that relate to industrial or employment or labour relations.
It follows that I, sitting as Judge of the High Court, have no jurisdiction to deal with the appeal placed before me. The dispute in question falls squarely within the mandate of the Employment and Labour Relations Court. I shall accordingly direct that the matter be transferred to the Employment and Labour Relations Court sitting at Kisumu for further directions.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at KAKAMEGA this 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2018
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE