[2018] KEELRC 92 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 92 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was injured in the course of employment and that the injury was assessed by a competent authority under WIBA, resulting in a recommendation for compensation of Kshs.144,000. The respondent failed to pay this amount and did not contest the claim. Additionally, the claimant was not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 92 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Phaisal Mohammed Bando; Respondent: Kaskazi Network Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Claim 219 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment Claim / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant
Judges
MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Work Injury Benefits, Arrears of Salary, Occupational Safety, Employee Compensation
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Work Injury Benefits Arrears of Salary Occupational Safety Employee Compensation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Phaisal Mohammed Bando

Claimant

Kaskazi Network Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation for work injury assessed under WIBA.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to arrears of salary for the period spent on sick leave after the work injury.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was injured in the course of employment and that the injury was assessed by a competent authority under WIBA, resulting in a recommendation for compensation of Kshs.144,000. The respondent failed to pay this amount and did not contest the claim. Additionally, the claimant was not paid salary for six months while on sick leave, and the respondent did not provide any defence or justification for the non-payment. The court held that the claimant had proved his case on a balance of probabilities and was entitled to both the assessed compensation and the arrears of salary. The court therefore awarded the sums claimed, with interest and costs.

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs.90,000 being six months' arrear salary.
  • The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs.144,000 as compensation assessed under WIBA within 14 days of judgment.