[2015] KEHC 3293 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 3293 (KLR)

The court found that the orders of inhibition and caution on LR.NO.KARINGANI/MUGIRIRWA/962 were preventing the implementation of its earlier judgment and decree, which had directed the transfer of the property to the applicant. Since the transfer documents were ready but could not be registered due to these...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 3293 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Phares Nyaga Nyiriia; Defendant: Mbiuki Bundi Ntiro; Defendant: Elizaphan Nyaga M'Bundi; Defendant: Petkay Swen Miriti M'Nkiria
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 106 of 2000
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Post Judgment Application
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Removal of Inhibition, Land Transfer, Execution of Decree, Title Deed Production
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Removal of Inhibition Land Transfer Execution of Decree Title Deed Production

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Phares Nyaga Nyiriia

Plaintiff

Mbiuki Bundi Ntiro

Defendant

Elizaphan Nyaga M'Bundi

Defendant

Petkay Swen Miriti M'Nkiria

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Post Judgment Application

  1. 1 Whether the inhibition and caution registered against LR.NO. KARINGANI MUGIRIRWA/962 should be removed to give effect to the court's decree and judgment.
  2. 2 Whether the production of the original title deed before the Land Registrar should be dispensed with to facilitate registration of the transfer.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the orders of inhibition and caution on LR.NO.KARINGANI/MUGIRIRWA/962 were preventing the implementation of its earlier judgment and decree, which had directed the transfer of the property to the applicant. Since the transfer documents were ready but could not be registered due to these encumbrances and the unavailability of the original title deed, the court held that it was just and necessary to remove the inhibition and caution and to dispense with the requirement for the original title deed. This would ensure that the applicant could enjoy the fruits of the judgment in his favor and that the decree of the court was not rendered nugatory by procedural obstacles....

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The order of inhibition and the caution registered against LR.NO. KARINGANI MUGIRIRWA/962 are removed to give effect to the decree and judgment of the court.
  • Production of the original title deed before the Land Registrar, Tharaka Nithi, is dispensed with.