[2004] KEHC 662 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to provide sufficient and credible evidence to justify the enlargement of time to file suit. The alleged misplacement of documents in the advocate's office was not substantiated by an affidavit from the advocate, and the court was not satisfied with the explanation provided....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] KEHC 662 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Philemon Kibet Langat; Respondent: Stage Coach Co. Ltd.
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 177 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Limitation Periods, Accident Claims
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Philemon Kibet Langat
Applicant
Stage Coach Co. Ltd.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient cause for the enlargement of time to file suit beyond the statutory limitation period.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to provide sufficient and credible evidence to justify the enlargement of time to file suit. The alleged misplacement of documents in the advocate's office was not substantiated by an affidavit from the advocate, and the court was not satisfied with the explanation provided. As such, the application lacked merit and was rejected.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for enlargement of time to file suit is rejected.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
4 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 177 OF 2004 PHILEMON KIBET LANGAT ……………………… PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT VERSUS STAGE COACH CO. LTD. …………………………DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT RULING:
Applicant seeks court to enlarge time to file suit. He was involved in an accident on 24/7/99. Suit should have been filed within 3 years. He now depones that documents were misplaced in the office of the advocate.
I have considered the application. It has no merit. I am not satisfied that there were documents misplaced in the Advocates office. The advocate has not sworn any affidavit to state that.
Application is therefore rejected. KABURU BAUNI AG. JUDGE 23/11/2004