[2018] KEELRC 860 (KLR)
The court found that the Claimant's employment was terminated without notice and without the Respondent providing any justification or evidence to rebut the Claimant's testimony. The Respondent failed to comply with statutory requirements under the Employment Act, 2007, including the issuance of notice, payment of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELRC 860 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Philice Khasungu Khayimba; Respondent: Jiangxi Water & Hydropower Construction Kenya Ltd
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 2062 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in full; judgment for the Claimant.
- Judges
- MSA Makhandia
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Termination, Overtime Pay, House Allowance, Annual Leave, Certificate of Service
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Philice Khasungu Khayimba
Claimant
Jiangxi Water & Hydropower Construction Kenya Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the termination of the Claimant's employment was unfair and unlawful.
- 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to terminal benefits including salary for August 2016, pay in lieu of notice, overtime, house allowance, accrued leave, and compensation.
- 3 Whether the Claimant is entitled to a certificate of service.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Claimant's employment was terminated without notice and without the Respondent providing any justification or evidence to rebut the Claimant's testimony. The Respondent failed to comply with statutory requirements under the Employment Act, 2007, including the issuance of notice, payment of terminal dues, and provision of a certificate of service. The Claimant's evidence on overtime, house allowance, accrued leave, and unpaid salary was unchallenged. The court held that the termination was unfair and unlawful, and awarded the Claimant the claimed terminal benefits and compensation. The Respondent was also ordered to issue a certificate of service and pay costs.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in full; judgment for the Claimant.
Orders
- Respondent to pay Claimant Kshs 12,000 as salary for August 2016.
- Respondent to pay Claimant Kshs 12,000 as pay in lieu of notice.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
51 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 2062 OF 2016
PHILICE KHASUNGU KHAYIMBA.................................. CLAIMANT
v
JIANGXI WATER AND HYDROPOWER
CONSTRUCTION KENYA LTD......................................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. Philice Khasungu Khayimba (Claimant) commenced legal proceedings against Jiangxi Water & Hydropower Construction Kenya Ltd (Respondent) on 6 October 2016 and the issue in dispute was stated as wrongful and unlawful termination of the Claimant by the Respondent and failure to pay her terminal benefits.
2. The firm of Wambugu & Muriuki Advocates entered Appearance for the Respondent on 26 October 2016, but no Response was filed.
3. On 7 March 2017, Mbaru J directed that the Cause proceed to formal proof and on 9 April 2018, the Deputy Registrar fixed the Cause for hearing on 20 June 2018.
4. The Cause was heard on the scheduled date and the Claimant gave sworn testimony. She filed submissions on 13 July 2018.
5. The Court has considered the pleadings, uncontroverted testimony of the Claimant and the submissions.
Unfair termination of employment
6. The Claimant’s evidence was that she was employed by the Respondent as a house keeper on 29 August 2013 and that she served until 31 August 2016 when she was called in the afternoon and informed that her services were no longer required. At the time of termination, the monthly wage was Kshs 12,000/-.
7. Pursuant to section 35(1)(c) of the Employment Act, 2007, the Respondent should have issued a notice of termination to the Claimant and since none was issued, the Court finds that the Claimant has shown that there was unfair termination of employment as envisaged under section 47(5) of the Employment Act, 2007.
8. Considering that the Claimant served for about 3 years, the Court assesses and awards compensation equivalent to 3 months gross wages.
Breach of contract
Overtime
9. According to the Claimant, she used to report to work at 7. 30am and leave at 7. 00pm instead of the agreed 8 hours. She stated that she was not paid overtime for the extra hours and sought Kshs 94,875/- on account of overtime for 3 years.
10. The Claimant’s testimony remaining unchallenged, the Court will allow this head of claim.
Salary for August 2018
11. The Claimant testified that she was not paid wages for August 2016.
12. An employee is entitled as of right to earned wages and since the Claimant served until 31 August 2016, she is entitled to the wages (the Claimant’s evidence was that she was earning Kshs 12,000/- per month).
House allowance
13. The Claimant also stated that she was not paid house allowance and sought Kshs 64,800/- as house allowance for 3 years of service.
14. In consideration of sections 10(3) and (7) and 31 of the Employment Act, 2007 and the unchallenged testimony on record, the Court will find for the Claimant.
Leave
15. The Claimant further testified that she was seeking Kshs 41,400/- on account of accrued annual leave for 3 years.
16. The Respondent was served but for unknown reasons, it did not file a Response or employment records for the Claimant.
17. The Claimant’s testimony therefore remained unchallenged and/or unrebutted.
18. In consideration of that position and the provisions of sections 9(2), 10(3),(7), 28, 31, 35(1)(c), 41, 43, 45 and 74 of the Employment Act, 2007, the Court finds for the Claimant.
Certificate of Service
19. A certificate of service is a statutory entitlement and the Respondent is ordered to issue one to the Claimant forthwith.
Conclusion and orders
20. The Court finds and holds that the termination of the Claimant’s employment was unfair and awards her
(a) Salary for August 2016 Kshs 12,000/-
(b) Pay in lieu of notice Kshs 12,000/-
(c) Overtime Kshs 94,875/-
(d) House allowance Kshs 64,800/-
(e) Accrued leave Kshs 41,400/-
(f) Compensation Kshs 36,000/-
TOTAL Kshs 261,075/-
21. Claimant to have costs.
Delivered, dated and signed in Nairobi on this 23rd day of October 2018.
Radido Stephen
Judge
Appearances
For Claimant Mr. Ndungu instructed by V.M. Ndungu & Co. Advocates
For Respondent Wambugu & Muriuki Advocates
Court Assistant Lindsey